Banner Advertise

Thursday, June 12, 2008

[vinnomot] Induced and imposed democracy for Bangladesh ? like pakistan?

dear all,
             The activities of foreign diplomats in Bangladesh clearly reveals that they want to see a imposed and induced democracy in our country.They want to up rooted the values and norms of democracy which exists even in their own countries.
They want to remain as king maker up to KIAMOT.
What should the patriotic people do now?
 
aminul islam
 

__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE
Blockbuster is giving away a free trial of Blockbuster Total Access to smart movie lovers like you.
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Yahoo! News

Get it all here

Breaking news to

entertainment news

Yahoo! Finance

It's Now Personal

Guides, news,

advice & more.

Moderator Central

Yahoo! Groups

Get the latest news

from the team.

.

__,_._,___

[vinnomot] Re: Motiur Rahman Nizami (Moitya Dalal)



Shamim Chowdhury <veirsmill@yahoo.com> wrote:

Motiur Rahman Nizami  (Moitya Dalal)
Motiur Nizami, 2004: the mastermind of all political killings and patron of various Mujahedin forces and Jihadist terrorist cells
The chief of operations of the al-Badr (Jamati death squad) forces, Motiur Rahaman Nizami is responsible for the murder of thousands of Bengalis involved in or connected to the liberation war. Son of Khondokar Lutfar Rahman of Monmothpur village under Sathia PS in Pabna district, Motiur has nothing to do with the title Nizami (Nizam means aristocrat i.e. Nizam of Hyderabad, India) at all . Like his other Islamist peers Motiur took up his title Nizami in order to make his name sound respectable, conceal his lowly origin and his base nature. The people of his village hated him so much for his shameless betrayal of his own countrymen that they still call him Moitya Dalal (traitor). Motiur is presently the minister for industries in Khaleda Zia's cabinet--a reward for Motiur's support of the Pakistani hunks Khaleda desrted her husband for in 1971.
Motiur Nizami's War Crimes in 1971
Motiur Nizami in 1971
Motiur carried out a wide range of activities against the Bangladesh liberation war of 1971. Motiur was the president of Jamat's youth front, the Islami Chhatra Sangha (now known as Islami Chhatra Shibir or the Islamic Students' Association). Under Motiur's direct supervision and leadership, the al-Badr (para-militia) force was organised in order to eliminate the freedom fighters and supporters of liberation movement. Motiur was the commander-in-chief of al- Badr forces. Apart from killing the freedom fighters and supporters of liberation movement, the aim of ideological warfare waged by the al-Badr forces was to Islamization (Talibanisation) of Bangladesh. One of the main objectives of al-Badr forces was to short list the secular Bangalee intellectuals and eliminate them. Horrifying stories of killing of intellectuals by Motiur's al-badr forces were published in newspapers, home and abroad, during and after the liberation war.
1. During the war Motiur acted as one of the top Jamati ideologues instigating his cohorts and followers by means of public speech and newspaper articles to support the Pakistani occupation army in killing the freedom fighters and supporters of liberation war. In one of the issues of Daily Sangram, the Jamati mouth piece, Motiur wrote : The day is not far away when the young men of al-Badr, hand in hand with the armed forces, will defeat the Hindu forces (enemies) and raise the victorious banner of Islam all over the world, after the destruction of India. (Daily Sangram Nov 14, 1971)
2. On April 12, 1971, Motiur joined Gholam Azam and other leading collaborators such as Sabur Khan to lead a procession in Dhaka to demonstrate their support for Pakistan. The procession, under the banner of peace committee ended with a special prayer for the victory of Pakistan. (Daily Sangram April 13, 1971).
3. In Jessore, a bordering district, Motiur, in addressing the assembly of the para militia forces at the district head quarter of the Razakar force, said: In this hour of national crisis, it is the duty of every razakar to carry out his national duties to eliminate those who are engaged in war against Pakistan and Islam. (Daily Sangram Sept 15, 1971)
3. People from Motiur's home district, Pabna, have brought allegations against Motiur's direct involvement in killing, rape, arson and lootings. One such person is Aminul Islam Dablu of Brishlika village under the Bera Police Station (in Bangladesh, due to the colonial legacy, all administrative units below districts are organised under a police station, PS, hence all sub-districts are called Thana or PS). Dablu told the commission that his father Mohamed Sohrab Ali was killed on the orders of Motiur. Dablu further said that a number of people from the area were killed on Motiur's orders such as: Profulla Pramanik, Bhadu Pramanik, Manu Pramanik and Shashthi Pramanik. Dablu said there were many eye witnesses to those killings.
4. Abdul Quddus, a freedom fighter from Madhabpur village in Pabna, once spent two weeks in an al-Badr torture cell following his arrest in an uneven war. Quddus said he heard plans to kill freedom fighters and local supporters of the war were discussed and drawn up by al-Badr men under Motiur's supervision.
5. On November 26 a razakar commander named Sattar took Pakistani troops to the Dhulaupara village where 30 freedom fighters were arrested and subsequently killed. As per Quddus's testimony, Sattar carried out the execution on Motiur's order. Quddus told the commission that he managed to attend a secret meeting of al-Badr forces which Motiur presided and gave instructions to kill freedom fighters. In the meeting the al-Badr men listed the houses of Awami League leaders and the bases and hide-outs of the freedom fighters. Motiur sternly ordered his men to finish off Awami League supporters and possible bases and safe houses being used by freedom fighters were identified. Quddus said Motiur gave orders to finish off Awami League supporters and destroy bases of the freedom fighters. The day after the meeting, Al-Badr forces, in cooperation with Razakars, surrounded Brishlika village and burnt it to the ground.
6. Quddus also said Motiur himself bayoneted to death one Bateswar Saha of Madhabpur village in Sathia PS.
7. In Pabna Motiur led the killing of a young freedom fighter Latif and his group. Latif was only 19 years old and a first year student of Pabna Edward College. Latif's small group was captured by the Pakistani occupation army in an uneven combat at Dhuliuri. They were then handed over to Motiur's gang for execution. Motiur's lieutenants publicly slew Latif's co-fighters with big camp knifes especially used for slaughtering bulls for sacrifice (during Islamic festival called korbani) as a part of Islamic ritual. The bastards in Motiur's group celebrated the killing of the captured freedom fighters with cannibalistic zeal. They gouged Latif's eyes, chopped off his genitalia and tied his dead body on a stick at Shanthia (Badshah, a socialist activist was killed in the same way by one of Motiur's top killer gang-JMJB in May 2004, please see Islamist Extremism in Bangladesh page). Latif's father Sufian Paramanik is a witness to his son's brutal murder and the razakars' frenzied outburst of pleasure in killing the brave sons of the soil.
8. Latif's brother Shahjahan Ali, a freedom fighter himself from Madhabpur village, nearly met the same fate. After slaughtering Shahjahan, along with his co-fighters, in Islamic manner, Motiur's people left him taking him for dead. But Shahjahan was a die hard freedom fighter. The slayer's knife could not take his life. Deadly wounded, Shahjahan lay on ground for hours. Foxes smelled at him, dogs bit him. Fortunately his relatives came by before it was too late and saved his life. Motiur's knife could not take Shahjahan's life, but took away his voice: now Shahjahan is paralyzed and can't talk carrying a big scar on his throat-Motiur's  kiss of death.
Verifiable list of people killed by Motiur and his al-Badr forces:
Mohd Sohrab Ali Profulla Pramanik Bhadu Pramanik
Monu Pramanik Shashati Pramanik Bateswar Saha
Freedom fighter Latif 30 freedom fighters in Latif's group Dara
Chand Muslem Akhter
Kabir    
In 1971 Motiur was personally involved in killing of hundreds of Hindus and confiscating their assets and properties. By confiscation and extortion of large amount of money, jewellery and assets from the wealthy Hindu families, Motiur became a millionaire within nine months of the war. During the Sheikh Mujib government (1971-75) Motiur went underground in order to escape conviction as a war criminal. In 1976, as a part of General Zia's razakar rehabilitation program, Motiur resurfaced and took charge as the second in charge of Jamat-e-Islam. Motiur is presently the chief of Jamat-e-Islam.
Besides his involvement in assassination, murder, extortion and confiscation, Nizami is also committed to establish Jamati ideological hegemony (a Maududi version of Islamic fundamentalism) to perpetuate the Islamic fundamentalism in Bangladesh. Since 1976, thanks to the political backing of the so-called freedom fighter Gen Zia and financial generosity of the Islamic countries like Saudi Arab, Iran and Libya, Motiur and his gang invested millions of dollars to open hundreds of Islamic kindergartens around the country. The syllabi and curricula of those kindergartens are based on the precepts of Maudoodi, the spiritual guru of Jamat-e-Islam. This network of schools enabled Jamat-e-Islam to sustain a huge number of their cadres as employees of those schools. From organizational point of view, those schools are a big success for Jamat-e-Islam: it secured them a sustaining source of income (education is the most thriving business in Bangladeshi cities) and employment for its cadres in education industry. But intellectually those schools cripple the students forever as they teach pre Copernican /Ptolemaic world views, orient them to alien Arabic culture and emotionally invest them with jejune Islamic sentiments. 
Jamat's goal to render intellectual bankruptcy is not confined to pre school stage only. Motiur successfully expanded its mission to the tertiary level as well. Motiur's wife founded an English medium college in the most aristocratic residential area in Dhaka city. The college boasts of having international educational standard as its name indicates " Manarat International College". The off-springs of the Muslim Bangladeshi elites swarm into that so-called English medium college. Manarat is an English medium college in the limited sense that it disseminates its knowledge in English language. But what constitutes its epistemological corpus? Koran and all forms of Arabic medieval precepts. The graduates from Manarat college are apparently smart (as the definition of smart in Bangladesh means ability to speak trash in English) but intellectually and attitudinally medieval: perfect elements for Islamic fundamentalism. Politically Gholam Azams and Mainuddins are feared monsters, but culturally Motiur's and Saidi's are more corrosive and their impact on society is far reaching.
Other crimes by Motiur Nizami
1. After the election in 2001, Motiur Nizami's armed men forced the members of 20 Hindu families in Pagla Haldar Para, part of Nizami's constituency,  to eat beef. (Daily Janakantha 10 Oct 2004)
2. Although Jamat preaches Wahabism its head Nizami gave a lavish Iftar party in the most expensive hotel in Bangladesh (Sonargaon) on 11 November 2003 when the northern districts of Bangladesh were devastated with famine. In the Iftar party Nizami invited top 550 elites of the country and spent 300,000 taka.
 
Maulana Rahmat Ali Bhisti: The portrait of a Jamati leader by late Prof Humayun Azad killed by Nizami-Saidi's goons
 
Reference:
  1. Liberation Museum
  2. Killers and Collaborators of 1971: An Account of Their Whereabouts, compiled and published by the Center for the Development of the Spirit of the Liberation War
  3. Commission on War Criminals of Bangladesh
  4. Saiduzzaman Raushan: Speeches and Statements of Killers & Collaborators of 1971

Courtesy: Muktadhara.net

__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE

You rock! Blockbuster wants to give you a complimentary trial of - Blockbuster Total Access.
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Yahoo! News

Odd News

You won't believe

it, but it's true

Yahoo! Finance

It's Now Personal

Guides, news,

advice & more.

Popular Y! Groups

Is your group one?

Check it out and

see.

.

__,_._,___

Re: [vinnomot] We should condemn all killers

 
 
 
The emergence of Peoples Republic of Bangladesh is a result of historical
process and struggle for democracy. It is not a result of  a "conspiricy" or  '
"political design" as many Mujib-basher  or Mujib-supportor would like
to explain. After the victory of 1970 general election, "legal" maneuvors for
finding  acceptable solution within the frame-work of  erstwhile Pakistan
continued. .... in essence  peaceful mass-actions developed into an all out 
armed  struggle  ..... the rest is history ....  Mujib getting arrested on the night
of March 25th 1971 was a prudent decision that gave an extra international
legitimacy to the Bangladesh Liberation War. There is no mystry about it.
 
The military-political situations sorrounding Fidel castro, Soekarno, Ben Bella,
Subash Bose, Surja Sen etc were uniquely different and should not be
analyzed on a comparative basis.
 
The leadeship phenomenon and the growth of a leader within a nation is not an
isolated event. The strength and weakness of any leader in general, and
Sheikh Mujibor Rahman in particular, should be looked upon, in the context of
socio-political situations prevailing among the masses.

Faruque Alamgir <faruquealamgir@yahoo.com> wrote:
The mystry of surrender by the the uncompromising leader Mujib will remain a suspicious mystry till it is unearthed. His surrender  surely fails him to attain the status(as claimed by Huakka hua Chunga Fukaiing jibis) of rebel leader like Fidel castro,Soekarno,Ben Bella,Subash Bose,Surja Sen etc etc WHO FOUGHT THE ENEMY FACE TO FACE.

Faruque Alamgir

--- On Wed, 6/11/08, Salahuddin Ayubi <s_ayubi786@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Salahuddin Ayubi <s_ayubi786@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [notun_bangladesh] Re: [khabor.com] We should condemn all killers
To: "Shamim Chowdhury" <veirsmill@yahoo.com>, notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2008, 8:50 PM

You are reacting like a trpical BAL activist. Tell me honestly iif the Sheikh wanted an independent bangladesh?  If he wanted then why did he surrenddered to the Pak Army? There wa no declaration of independence from him. He left us in front of the Pakistani butchers unprepared and unarmed.  Bengali sodirs of the Pak Army, BDG and Police were not alerted about the impending disasters that is going to befall them though he very well knew what is coming. . In twelveth Night Shakes peare has said " Some are born great, some achieve greatness and some have greatness thrust upon them" On the Sheikh the greatness was thrust upon as Benaglais did not have a sensible leader to lead them at the time.. As for Jamat, they believed in Pakistan and acted as loyal Pakistanis  thoght the rest f the country had rebelled.
             Salahuddin Ayubi

--- On Wed, 6/11/08, Shamim Chowdhury <veirsmill@yahoo. com> wrote:
From: Shamim Chowdhury <veirsmill@yahoo. com>
Subject: [notun_bangladesh] Re: [khabor.com] We should condemn all killers
To: "Shamim Chowdhury" <veirsmill@yahoo. com>
Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2008, 6:44 PM

Mr. S.A. Hannan, you are going out of bound. Understandingly your pro Pakistani writing has brought the ghost image of what you and your party did during liberation war.
 
You comments about our glorious liberation war as civil war. Your diehard attempt to save skin of Jamaati killer al-badars are nothing new BUT your comments in this letter where you precisely condemned freedom fighters for fighting against Rajakar al-badars (slaves of Pakistani army) and killing them in terms of war is totally unacceptable. I condemn you for your ugly thought of doing trickery to save devil golam azam-nizami- akm Yusuf gong.
 
You are making your self a naked man, one who has no more clothes to hide your unashamed unapologetic, unrepentant jamaati mind.
 
If you have to condemn all killing without considering anything then are you willing to condemn all killing that took place on both side during war led by Prophet Mohammad (PBUH)? Your illogical comments were adolescent though I know how clever you are.
 
Please refrain from disguising your self as a scholar which you are not and please desist yourself of making our liberation war a mockery.
 
With Jamaat-e-Islami, we should do exactly what our prophet did to the Jewish tribe of Medina who betrayed during the war and joined hands with the attacking forces of Quraish. To follow our Prophet (PBUH) Sunnah we should execute all male members of Jamaat WHO ARE IN FAULT after tribunal finds them guilty and send all female and kids to exile ( Pakistan ). That will be a solution in light of Islam.
 
I urge everyone to condemn Mr. Hanna¢s mischievous plan to humiliate our liberation history as an attempt to save Jamaati collaborators.
 
Shamim Chowdhury
Maryland, USA
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
--- In khabor@yahoogroups. com, "S A Hannan" wrote:

Dear members,

Assalamu Alaikum.We should condemn all killers , killers of innocent
Muslims and Non-Muslim Bengalees, killers of Biharis and migrant
population of India to the then East Pakistan, killers of freedom
fighters and killers of Rajakars, that is all killings made at that
time without trial.by various forces.

If demand is made of trial of killers , it should be for killers of all
kinds and groups without any discrimination.

We should try to see the truth in keeping with the turbulent situation
of the time created by various forces.We should not be guides by
one-sided propaganda of any one party.

Shah Abdul Hannan
----- Original Message -----
From: AbuSayeed Rahman
To: khabor@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:04 AM
Subject: Re: [khabor.com] Who were responsible for the break up of
Pakistan ??


NIce arguments and counter arguments !!



Mr Javed, try to accept the fact.

Just try to know what your great patriotic Pakistani Army

did in 1971 in East Pakistan.

Don't just comment on 'propaganda' made by Pakistani media.

Well, I am not surprised.

You are typical Pakistani. (ignorant about the real

incidents of 1971 and moved by the Pakistani official

propaganda).

To me there is another surprise .

I met a serving Pakistani Army officer about seven/eight years ago

(he was a Major at that time: may be he is Lt Col or Full Colonel now).



The fact he told me was a real surprise.

Even Sheikh Mujib did not say that before 1970 election !!

He told me that most of the West Pakistani civilian officers

who were posted in East Pakistan used to consider himself/herself

as the 'lord' and they expected East Pakistani people to 'serve' them.

And on going back to West Pakistan, they used to tell the stories

of their 'experience' of getting services as a lord !!!



So, these West Pakistani bosses used to consider themselves

as the colonial power and people of East Pakistan was
............ .........? ??





Dr Abu Sayeed





Khurram



--- On Wed, 6/11/08, Javed Iqbal Kaleem javediqbalkaleem@ ... wrote:

From: Javed Iqbal Kaleem javediqbalkaleem@ ...
Subject: Re: [khabor.com] Who were responsible for the break up of
Pakistan ??
To: khabor@yahoogroups. com
Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2008, 11:15 AM


I have written on this subject before. Pakistan army was a continuation
of British rule. They gave the freedom with one hand and took it back
with other. Mujbiur Rahaman, in spite of being an intelligent
politician, exploited the disparity created by army. We got it in
inheritance. It was the British who picked soldiers from two backward
districts of West Pakistan. Our people, politicians and aristocrats had
nothing to do with the composition of Army. Here patience was required,
as the retiring officers could have been replaced from East Pakistan
until provincial quota was fulfilled. But Mujib wanted to make the
change overnight. That was the reason Army and AL could not agree to
transfer of power. Mujib was going to be elected as PM of whole
Pakistan , but quite foolishly he preferred to become President
of Bangladesh, because he had already did a deal with Indian agency
RAW.

I have also quoted the example of two women who came to the court of
King Solomon (A.S.) claiming a boy as their son. He ordered him to be
cut into two pieces and given one each to the two claimant women. The
real mother agreed to forgo her right, but the other woman did not. So
Hazrat Sulaiman gave the son to his mother and his life was saved.

But unfortunately, neither Pak Army nor Awami League were true in their
love for the country. It was expected of the army officers, but not AL
politicians. Because they had participated in political struggle side by
side with Quaide Azam, Husain Shaheed Suharwardy and Maulvi Fazlul Haq.
They were expected to show some patience and refuse to compromise
territorial integrity and sovereignty of Pakistan. But by overreacting
and hurrying for transfer of power Mujib facilitated breakup of
Pakistan, world's largest Muslim State, the second state after the state
of Madhinah to have been established on the basis of Islam.

Jamaate Islami is far superior to AL because it was seeking to
represent the entire Millate Paksitan and not Sindhis, Pathans
of Bengalis. These elements represent politics of jahilya (age
of ignorance when every man fought for his tribe). For Muslims
cause of love is Islam and cause of hatred absence of Islam. So
JI called every single Pakistani to vote for a balanced system which
would provide justice to each and every nationality, area and person,
in the country. If the people of West Pakistan were not under undue
influence of aristocracy, they would have voted for it. East
Pakistanis were better off in this respect, but they were taken over by
anti Pakistan propaganda of AL. It often happens that a party takes
extreme line to win the polls, but after winning the elections adopts a
moderate stance so as to enhance its base to the whole country. But
instead of making it humble and considerate, the election victory made
AL more arrogant and hostile to the common cause.

Every single person, Syed Maududi or Shaikh Mujibur Rahman, will one
day face the Lord to account for his deeds. And that success is the
real success. Only Allah knows what will happen on that day. But one
can see that the Jamaat at least talked of Islam, Pakistan and
Justice, whereas AL talked in terms of parochialism and hatred of the
days of jahaliya (ignorance). For people like Mr. Farid, let me make
it clear that to divide people on ethnic lines has been declared an act
of jahaliya by holy prophet of Islam.


Muhammad Javed Iqbal

faridsrahman wrote:

--- In khabor@yahoogroups. com, Javed Iqbal Kaleem
wrote:
>
> He mentions millions of sacrifices but conveniently forgets to
> mention the fact that if Awami League showed patience and acted
> wisely these lives would not have lost in the first place. No
> matter how much lies are spread by Awami League stalwarts, the
> facts remains that Mujib died as a great sinner who attempted to
> break world's largest Islamic country. He would be held accountable
> for this sin before the Creator.
>
> Muhammad Javed Iqbal
>

Javed Iqbal proclaims vehemently, "Mujib died as a great sinner who
attempted to break world's largest Islamic country. He would be held
accountable for this sin before the Creator".

Now, that's what we call chutzpah!

Javed Iqbal exhibits not even an iota of regret for the wanton
genocide/rapes in East Pakistan. His sole concern is that Pakistan
failed to retain its empire with the Bengalis as a subject people. To
add insult to the injury he condemns Mujib as a great sinner who
"would be held accountable for this sin before the Creator". How much
more vile and obscene can he get?

As for patience, hadn't East Pakistanis been patient since the time of
Jinnah and Liaqat Ali Khan? What was the result? Leaders like
Sher-e-Bangla Fazlul Huq and Suhrawardy were repeatedly insulted,
called Indian agents and marginalized. And when they won landslide
elections in the 1954 election, the ministry was dismissed within
weeks under the pretext that the election winners were traitors!

Yahya Khan was obviously emboldened by all that to imagine after the
1970 elections that all he needed to do was "sort out the Bengalis".
Murder of 3 million civilians and the rape of a quater million women
were no more than the military's duty to keep the Pakistan empire
united with East Pakistan as a colony. What were East Pakistanis
supposed to do? Meekly accept a repeatation of past history? What
happened was worse. The British imperialists couldn't have even
imagined what the Pakistan army did in Bangladesh.

And now, some three dozen years after those horrible crimes against
humanity, Javed Iqbal has the temerity to say that Mujib is a sinner
who will have to answer to the Creator!!

Javed Iqbal, it is the military that broke Pakistan, not Awami League.
Yahya Khan was an illegitimate ruler who had usurped power in 1969 to
prevent the Bengali Speaker of the National Assembly from succeeeding
Ayub Khan. The military had believed that elections will throw up a
fragmented Parliament and it will be able to continue to with its
dictatorship behind the facade of a squabbling Parliament.

Unfortunately for the military, Awami League won absolute majority on
its own. Moreover, it had the sympathy and the support of Wali Khan's
National Awami Party. The military, obviously, would have none of it.
It decided to block the majority in the Parliament from framing the
Constitution and forming the ministry so that the status quo could be
maintained.


And what was the status quo? It was the Pakistan empire under military
dictatorship with East Pakistan as a colony and Bengalis as a subject
people. The military was willing to shed as much Bengali blood as it
took and dishonor as many Bengali women as it could to maintain the
status quo. And when all that failed, it had the dubious distinction
of expelling the majority from the country!

In Javed Iqbal's book, it is the victims that must be damned - Mujib
is a sinner who must answer the Creator for his sins!! The military
who perpetrated the crimes are martyrs and the Jamaatis who supported
and abetted those horrendous crimes in East Pakistan are the heroes!

Javed Iqbal, taking the cue from his evil Jamaate Islami, looks upon
human beings as mere objects. East Pakistanis had to suffer thru
unspeakable crimes to atone for failure to vote for Jamaate Islami.
Awami League had to suufer for failing to bring the Jamaate Islami in
West Pakistan into the corridors of power thru the backdoor.

It is not that Javed Iqbal cares any more for the ordinary people of
West Pakistan. He has taken to boasting of Pakistanis becoming cannon
fodder for Jamaate Islami's passion to pursue jihad in Chechniya,
Bosnia, Afghanistan and Kashmir. But how come Jamaate Islami doesn't
ask anyone to engage in jihad against the feudal order in Pakistan
which today is infamous for the most feudal of South Asian societies?

It is the Jamaatis who are guilty of the greatest crimes against
humanity. And they will be held accountable for them by the Creator.











------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ------\
------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.24.6/1482 - Release Date:
6/4/2008 7:10 AM

--- End forwarded message ---






__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE
Blockbuster is giving away a free trial of Blockbuster Total Access to smart movie lovers like you.
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Yahoo! News

Odd News

You won't believe

it, but it's true

Yahoo! Finance

It's Now Personal

Guides, news,

advice & more.

Y! Messenger

Send pics quick

Share photos while

you IM friends.

.

__,_._,___

[vinnomot] Lynch mob kills nine robbers in Bangladesh: police (Can we stop this c ruel justice?)

If Police was doing its job, people didn't have to do that. Police doesn't arrest Robbers because they share half of the loot with Police. There have been such 4 instances in Pakistan in a couple of weeks ago also. They try to burn the Robbers alive there.
 
I think, its Democracy in action and swift fast justice, when the System of Government fails public.

"mohiuddin@netzero.net" <mohiuddin@netzero.net> wrote:
Lynch mob kills nine robbers in Bangladesh: police
Thu Jun 12, 3:20 AM ET
DHAKA (AFP) - A group of nine armed robbers were beaten to death or shot in northern Bangladesh on Thursday by a mob of angry villagers, police said.
ADVERTISEMENT
Some 500 villagers surrounded the robbers after they were spotted in a field in the northern district of Natore, local police chief Mohammad Abubakr told AFP.
"At least eight robbers were caught by villagers and beaten mercilessly as they tried to flee the village by shooting at the mob," he said, adding that the bullet-riddled body of another robber was found nearby.


____________________________________________________________
Sweepstakes!!!
Enter for your chance to WIN a summer spa getaway!


__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE
Blockbuster is giving away a free trial of Blockbuster Total Access to smart movie lovers like you.
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Yahoo! News

Odd News

You won't believe

it, but it's true

Yahoo! Finance

It's Now Personal

Guides, news,

advice & more.

Real Food Group

Share recipes,

restaurant ratings

and favorite meals.

.

__,_._,___

[vinnomot] Lynch mob kills nine robbers in Bangladesh: police (Can we stop this c ruel justice?)

Lynch mob kills nine robbers in Bangladesh: police

Thu Jun 12, 3:20 AM ET

DHAKA (AFP) - A group of nine armed robbers were beaten to death or shot in northern Bangladesh on Thursday by a mob of angry villagers, police said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Some 500 villagers surrounded the robbers after they were spotted in a field in the northern district of Natore, local police chief Mohammad Abubakr told AFP.

"At least eight robbers were caught by villagers and beaten mercilessly as they tried to flee the village by shooting at the mob," he said, adding that the bullet-riddled body of another robber was found nearby.



____________________________________________________________
Sweepstakes!!!
Enter for your chance to WIN a summer spa getaway!

__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE
You rock! Blockbuster wants to give you a complimentary trial of Blockbuster Total Access.
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Yahoo! News

Odd News

You won't believe

it, but it's true

Yahoo! Finance

It's Now Personal

Guides, news,

advice & more.

Autos Group

on Yahoo! Groups

Discuss ways to

fix your car.

.

__,_._,___

Re: [vinnomot] Mr. SA Hannan's Ulterior Motives behind "We should condemn all killers"

Thank you Mr. Aslam for your adequate reply and analysis on Mr. S. A. Hannan's ulterior motive. Now that many years have elapsed since our independence in 1971, the supporters of Jamaati killers and Razakars think that they can twist the facts and can help the criminals to get away with the war crimes. Keeping these in their minds, they are making an all-out effort to confuse and diffuse the occurrences of inhuman acts perpetuated by the Islamic fundamentalist parties namely, Jamaat-I-Islami and Muslim League in 1971.
 
I was a ninth grader in 1971. I still remember the heinous acts committed by the evil forces of the Razakars and their Pakistani military masters in a small town under Sylhet district. There are many events of killings and torture that took place in and around Maulvibazar (at that time a sub-division under Sylhet district), where we used to live in 1971. I am mentioning just one of the events.
 
In one of the villages close to the small town Maulvibazar, a gentleman (a Muslim and most probably an "Al-Haj") had a Hindu neighbor. They were very friendly neighbors as we heard at that time. While the Hindu family were leaving for India to save their lives, they left some of their valuable statues and ornaments (made of gold) to their Muslim neighbor with an understanding that they would get these back if they could return from India someday. The Muslim neighbor kept the valuables somewhere in the subsurface of his backyard by digging a hole. Unfortunately, this was leaked out and the Razakars took the matter into their hands. The joint forces of Razakars and the Pakistani military raided the house and found the ornaments and golden statues. This was considered a crime by Pakistani military, Razakars, and the collaborators. The joint forces arrested the old gentleman and his sons (most probably two sons as far as I remember).
One of the leading Pakistani collaborators in Maulvibazar was "Mr. Inamullah." It was well-known that under his leadership and enthusiasm, the arrestees were decided to be killed in public for helping a Hindu family, who, according to them were the enemies of Pakistan and Islam. Accordingly, the announcement was made. The gentleman and his sons were handcuffed and were placed on the middle of a bridge across the Manu River (close to the town). A few minutes before the execution, the officer-in-charge (OC) of the police station announced and warned everyone present on the consequence for helping the enemies of Pakistan and Islam. The OC was forced to make this announcement because after finishing his short speech, he collapsed there while holding the microphone in his hand but Mr. Inamullah was very enthusiastic and gave a lengthy speech to warn everyone in Maulvibazar if they dared to help any Hindu family.  Finally, the Pakistani army fired shots to the old gentleman and his sons from the banks of the river. After killing them, a couple or so Pakistani army kicked the dead bodies from the top of the bridge to the Manu River.
The whole incidence was described by a person, who was present to observe the heinous acts. He went there to see how low (in terms of cruelty, heinousness, and inhumanity) the collaborators and their Pakistani masters could go. After independence in December 1971, Inamullah was caught by the freedom fighters probably in February 1972. They decided to kill him the way he organized to kill an innocent gentleman and his sons in public. While I was standing outside our house, I heard the announcement on the day and time for the public execution of Inamullah. I must admit that I felt very happy after hearing the announcement. The sufferings of those innocent people were in my mind and I thought that Inamullah should get the equal cruel treatment.
At that time, the government under Awami League was not fully established and not fully functional just after independence. In fact, the government high-ups were trying to calm down the situation and bring the war criminals under the rule of law. In the case of Razakar Inamullah, the government interfered and they stopped his execution in public. Inamullah was later sent to jail and his execution in public was cancelled. The anger of the public on Inamullah was so much that many people did not like the cancellation of his execution in public by the government. After many years, while I used to think about this, I realized that the government did the right thing by protecting these people from the wreath and anger of the public, who suffered under their repression. Otherwise, there would have been more anarchy and lawlessness in the country. Proper efforts were taken by the government to arrest the Razakars and collaborators to punish them legally for the crimes they committed against humanity.
I have mentioned the above heinous acts of a notorious collaborator and Razakar and the reaction of the freedom fighters/public after independence just to draw the attention of Mr. S. A. Hannan. He should understand the war crimes committed by the evil forces of Jamaat-I-Islami and their allies. He should also understand the reaction not only of the freedom fighters but also of the public in general against the war criminals after our independence. I hope Mr. Hannan  (as a conscious individual) will take side against the war criminals and he will stop creating confusion by writing against those who took arms to resist the Jamaati and other war criminals and help save the helpless people of Bangladesh in 1971.
Shabbir Ahmed
 


Syed Aslam <gungadina3@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mr. SA Hannan's Ulterior Motives behind "We should condemn all killers"
 
WRT:
 
Dear All
 
The "trial of the collaborators and killers" is a National Issue  and is not
guided by "one-sided propaganda of any one party" as Mr. Hannan is tryiing
to portray.
 
What the Jamaatis are afraid of, Mr. Hannan?
 
What a ingenous way to put all in one bracket and thereby absolve Jamaat's
crimes!
 
The collaborators of the foreign occupation regime (Jamaati Islami
and its Gestapo Al-bodor Bahini) must be given examplary punishment, so that the
history does not repeat again. We must set our PRIROTIES. First thing first !
Between March 25-December 16, 1971 the Jamaat Islami, the party as whole
was the main collaborator of the occupation regime.These Jamaatis are the worst
criminals in the history of our nation..... the Uzbekistan-born Mir Zafor Ali Khan
collaborated with the foreigners [British], but the local born Jamaate Islami cadres
not only collaborated with the foreign occupation army but also actively participated
in the killing missions......that makes Jamaatis worse than the Mir Jafor.
 
Besides many other attrocities, the killing of the intelluctuals in December
1971 was a part of Jamaat's master plan, made by the then Jamaate Islami's
highest level. The plan had the blessings of the  occupation regime and executed by the 
caders of the Jamaat's student wing Islami Chattro Sangha and its gestapo wing Albadar
Bahini. The Islami Chattro Sangha's crimes were so henious and so gravious that Jamaate
Islami leadership had to changed its name of Shangha to Chattro Sibir.
 
The organized forces of Mukti Bahini played an active role to save the innocent
non-Bengalis from the wrath and anger of the ordinary masses who were victimized
by some Pakistan-ponthi Biharis and razakers, albadar, al shams etc. during during 
previous nine months in 1971.
 
Mr. Hannan's attempts to put everyone in the same bracket is an attempt to save the
Jamaati collaborators and killer through oblique allusion His intention is often to insult
and accuse the freedom fighters & liberation war by double entendre and thereby
undermine our victory.
 
Here, I am not condoning the "excesses" done by the mobs during the first few weeks
after  liberation. That was essentially a law and order problem in the absence of an
efficient administration and strong police force in a war-ravaged newly independent
country. Nothing can be compared to the rapes, atrocities and killings by the Pak Army
and their collaborators [Razakers, Albodors Alshams etc]. As a consequence, certain
kind spontaneous mob psychology developed which resulted in the excesses. The families
suffered, their women were raped, their houses were burned and many family members
were tortured and. killed  The crimes of Jamaati Razakers, albodors and al-shams were
premeditated, pre-planned and well organized with the blessings of the Pakistani
Military Junta which should never be forgotten and forgiven. The ideology [Pakistan
Doctrine] that created the local collaborators, misguided, motivated and inspired them
should also be thorowly analyzed and properly stopped.
 
It must be mentioned here that improvised Bihari's were kept in ghettos and "permanent
refugee camps" after they migrated to "the then East Pakistanin late forties and early
fifties by the Pakistani rulers with some ulterior motives.
 
The poor Biharis were occasionally used as hooligans by the Muslim League and other
reactionaries to attack and suppress the democratic movements during fifties and sixties.
The Santahar and Syedpur communal riots in 1950 and Dhaka anti-Hindu riot during Indo-Pak
war in 1965 was participated entirely by the  Bihari goons instigated by the Ayub Regime.
[read Dangar Itihash and "Purbo Bangla Rukhiya Darao" for communal harmony by Taffazol
Hossain Manik Miah].
 
Most migrants from West Bengal and Assam were assimilated with the common people
of Bangladesh [the then East Pakistan] and didn't take any anti-Bangladesh position in
1971. Some of them were very patriotic freedom fighters. A large number of urdu
speaking refugees from India living in Bangladesh [the then East Pakistan] were misguided
and used as rioters and killers against the ordinary people, Bangalee Hindus and  Muslims
without any discrimination.
 
There is definitely a heinous and ulterior motive behind Jamaati Advisor Mr. S.A. Hannan's
amalgamation of everyone in the same bracket and delibarate mix up of issues.
[Dhama chapa dewar Apo-koushol].
 
BTW, Mr S.A. Hannan talks about all the "condemning  all killers , killers of
innocent Muslims and Non-Muslim Bengalees,  killers of Biharis and migrant population
of India to the then East Pakistan, killers of freedom fighters and killers of Rajakars,
that is all killings  made at that time without trial by various forces".
 
Mr. Hannan, who are these innocent Muslims and who are these Non-Muslim
Bangalees? Can you elaborate?
 
Yes, notorious Monaem Khan was killed by a Muktijoddha [of course, without a
tial]. Do you think this patriot freedom fighter should be tried too?
  
Syed Aslam
 
On 6/11/08, S A Hannan <sahannan@sonarbangladesh.com> wrote:
 
Dear members,
 
Assalamu Alaikum.We should condemn all killers , killers of innocent Muslims and
Non-Muslim Bengalees,  killers of Biharis and migrant population of India to the
then East Pakistan, killers of freedom fighters and killers of Rajakars, that is all killings 
made at that time without trial.by various forces.
 
 If demand is made of trial of killers , it should be for killers of all kinds and
groups without any discrimination.
 
We should try to see the truth in keeping  with the turbulent situation of the
time created by various forces. We should not be guides by one-sided propaganda of
any one party. 
 
Shah Abdul Hannan
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:04 AM
Subject: Re: [khabor.com] Who were responsible for the break up of Pakistan ??
NIce arguments and counter arguments  !!
 
Mr Javed, try to accept the fact.
Just try to know what your great patriotic Pakistani Army
did in 1971 in East Pakistan.
Don't just comment on 'propaganda' made by Pakistani media.
Well, I am not surprised.
You are typical Pakistani. (ignorant about the real
incidents of 1971  and moved by the Pakistani official
propaganda).
To me there is another surprise .
I met a serving Pakistani Army officer about seven/eight years ago
(he was a Major at that time: may be he is Lt Col or Full Colonel now).
 
The fact he told me was a real surprise.
Even Sheikh Mujib did not say that  before 1970 election  !!
He told me that most of the West Pakistani civilian officers
who were posted in East Pakistan used to consider himself/herself
as the 'lord' and they expected East Pakistani people to 'serve' them.
And on going back to West Pakistan, they used to tell the stories
of their 'experience' of getting services as a lord  !!!
 
So, these West Pakistani bosses used to  consider themselves
as the  colonial power and people of East Pakistan was ....................???
 
 
Dr Abu Sayeed


 
Khurram

__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE

You rock! Blockbuster wants to give you a complimentary trial of - Blockbuster Total Access.
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Yahoo! Finance

It's Now Personal

Guides, news,

advice & more.

Yahoo! News

Get it all here

Breaking news to

entertainment news

Discover Tips

on healthy living

and healthy eating

on Yahoo! Groups.

.

__,_._,___