Banner Advertise

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

[vinnomot] Politics unto death

Vows Jalil after bail, 'resumes' charge of AL general secretary

Immediately after getting ad interim bail yesterday, Abdul Jalil resumed responsibility as Awami League (AL) General Secretary ending all speculations over his return to politics, and announced that he would continue to be in politics until the last day of his life.

He returned home on August 31 after prolonged treatment in Singapore since his release on parole on March 2.

Jalil formally starts his activities as party general secretary this morning after placing wreaths at the portrait of father of the nation Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman on Road-32 at Dhanmondi in the capital.

"I have been involved in politics for long 45 years and I will continue to be so for people's welfare as long as I am alive," Jalil said responding to a query about his earlier statement on quitting politics.

Jalil's announcement to resume as the party general secretary has meanwhile evoked mixed reactions within the AL.

Even party President Sheikh Hasina called acting party chief Zillur Rahman over phone and wanted to know under which grounds Jalil took the charge suddenly.

"She [Hasina] phoned me and wanted to know how he [Jalil] took charge," Zillur told The Daily Star last night.

Sources said Hasina had advised Jalil a couple of days ago to take rest rather than taking charge as the party's general secretary. She said acting General Secretary Syed Ashraful Islam would continue his job.

Speculations about his return to politics grew following his 'mercy petition' to the caretaker government on July 5 last year seeking release, and stating that he had decided to retire from politics, if necessary. In the petition, he also blasted AL President Sheikh Hasina for her 'dictatorial leadership'.

Asked about the petition sent to the government through his wife Rehana Jalil, the AL leader said it would not be proper to create 'further confusion' about it. "I don't know from where the letter (petition) came. But I did not send any letter stating that I'll quit politics, and my wife also did not," he told a press briefing at the Supreme Court Bar Association soon after getting bail.

He however said he had sent a letter to the government for his release and treatment.

But on July 15 last year, in an interview with a private television channel Jalil said he himself wrote a letter to the chief adviser about quitting politics and appealed for his release. Later, he said he might join politics if he is released and recovers from illness.

He also questioned yesterday under which law the media was allowed to interview him while in detention.

Jalil alleged that he was arrested and charged only for harassment. He said his leader [Hasina] had told him that everything was being done with ill motive.

The AL leader mentioned that as per the party constitution, he is supposed to resume activities as general secretary.

"As I was released on parole for treatment on condition that I will not engage in politics or make any political speech while on parole, I did not want to violate it since I am respectful to the rule of law. I was just waiting for bail," he said.

"I asked my party colleague Syed Ashraful Islam (acting general secretary) to continue doing my job. Since my parole was supposed to end today (yesterday), I appealed to the High Court for bail and got bail until October 20," Jalil said. "As a bailed person, I now announce my resumption of duties as Awami League general secretary."

He blamed the media for creating confusion in the past over his party responsibility. "But now there is no scope to create further confusion over the matter," he said.

Replying to another query, Jalil said the AL had supported the caretaker government's anti-corruption drive but it was later conducted on political grounds. "It is not proper to harass people in the name of anti-corruption drive."

JALIL-ZILLUR MEETING
After the press briefing, Jalil rushed to AL acting President Zillur Rahman's Gulshan residence. Zillur received him cordially and expressed satisfaction that he got bail from the High Court.

"We have repeatedly said there is no allegation against him [Jalil]. He was charged and arrested on false and fabricated allegation. We had said earlier that he would not go into hiding if he is set free," said Zillur.

Referring to BNP Chairperson Khaleda Zia's bail, the acting AL chief said they welcome it. But all must be equal before law, he said, adding the government has no right to keep many others detained after the release of Khaleda and her son Tarique Rahman.

Zillur said it now depends on Jalil when he will resume his activities as AL general secretary. But as per the party constitution, the responsibility went to him immediately after his return to the country, he added.

Jalil was arrested by the joint forces from his Mercantile Bank office in the capital on May 28 last year. As he fell sick after his arrest, he was taken to Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Hospital. As his condition deteriorated , he was shifted to LabAid Cardiac Hospital.

Since his condition deteriorated further, he was set free on parole on March 2 for treatment abroad. The next day he went to Singapore and had treatment in Mount Elizabeth Hospital for about six months.
  http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=54266


আল্লাহ যাকে যখন ইচ্ছা ক্ষমতা দান করেন,মাইনাস টু ফরমুলায় তাই হাসেন
http://www.microscopiceye.blogspot.com/

__._,_.___
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Give Back

Yahoo! for Good

Get inspired

by a good cause.

Y! Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___

[vinnomot] How to cripple a commisson that government is forced to create?

How to cripple a commisson that government is forced to create?
The latest example of this ongoing practice is the appointment of secretary of National Human Rights Commission, even before deciding who the members of the commission will be! This disfunctional practice should stop.
 
 
We have seen this again and again.
 
People demand for news institutions like Anti-Corruption Commission, Telecom Commission, Energry Commission and many others. First response from the top burecrats is to suggest whoever in power is - it will create problem for the government or it is not necessary or we have some other department or bureau doing exactly the same thing or this would be waste of money or something similar.
 
In a nutshell, their policy is to stall the process or slow the process. 
 
But at some point, they can not carry on. Either from pressure from the civil soceity or pressure from the people or pressure from the development partners or a combination of all of them create a situation when the stupids in the helm actually gain some courage and tell their subbordinate bureacrats that its now time to create the regulatory body (e.g. ACC, BTRC, ERC, etc).
 
When they see no other way, the take all the necessary steps. But its not done yet. The real stalling process only starts.
 
Once every thing is ready on paper (at the policy level), they start the process of stalling in the operational level. They will not have any hiring policy, no organogram, no funding or some other similar procedural problems. With all these obstackles, they prevent the long - cherished body to function for several more years. This whole process starts with a single stroke.
 
They make constitutational body into a burecratic organization. The process starts with the appointment of a secretary even before deciding who the members of the body will be.
 
That person, someone from the actual bureacracy joins the body and set up the whole thing, hire some people (probably crooks). In other words, the job of this advance team is to make the initial setup in such a way - whoever comes in as a head or policy making members, they will be burdened with all the pre-set things.
 
Reading this, someone from the administration might argue that this allegation is really absurd. If there is no secretary and the official setup before, how come the members and chairman will start their job from the day one when they are selected. Sounds logical? You couldn't be more wrong!
 
The idea that everything must be setup before the head of the commission joins the body - this very idea is based on a wrong premise. These constitution commissions are not some bearucratic department or bureaus that you should setup using pre-set rules. These constituational bodies are born to tackle a specific problem that is created out of system bureacratic system.
 
We can define it differently.
 
If you accept that burecracy is necessary evil, then these commissions are aimed at to reduce those evils within the bureacracy. You can not expect to reduce those evils with the application of same kind of bureacracy.
 
So, what do we suggest. There is no general rule - that is the suggestion. You have to first hire a person whom you think is competent enough to be the chairman of the commission. Once you do that, leave the details to that person. If someone do not know how to do new things - he or she is not suitable for the job.
 
This approach is particualrly applicable for a commission which is created new - as it was the case for ACC, BTRC, ERC, etc. But none was initialized as they should have been. As a result they all lost first of several years of their lifetime and most of them are still carrying the scurs.
 
The newest chapter of the same storybook is unfolding as we speak. Yes, we are refering to the HR Commission.
 
Should we pain-stakingly watch the near death experience of this newest commission before that is again reconstituted in several years time before it can start again? This current government has already proven itself that they are also not any different as far as their dealings w.r.t. bureacracy is concerned. So, why should we expect a different result?
 
It will go through the same process, it seems. Read the following news "Dhaka, Sept 10 (bdnews24.com) – Humayun Khaled, a joint secretary at the education ministry, will be secretary to the National Human Rights Commission on deputation, the establishment ministry said Wednesday. The commission was set up on Sept 1 in compliance with the National Human Rights Commission Ordinance 2007. The government had earlier formed a six-member search committee to appoint the chairman and members for the commission."
 
Lifecycle has started, they appointed the secretary of the HR Commission. In three years time, Sultan Kalam or Dr. Kamal or Mrs. Anam or somebody similar from the civil soceity watch-dog will come to the press and tell us that the HR Commission is a bogus one, its disfunctional.
 
That is another problem with our soceity.
 
These so-called watch-dogs are actually retarded-watch-dogs or sleeping-watch-dogs. They do not have the ability to understand that something bad is going to happen, until something actually happens.
 
And probably that is why this cycle of mis-management is continuing. Because, burecrats are always dogs, they bark as long as they think they are safe. Tai na? Mr. current PSC Chairman?
 
(By the way, we do not have any personal issue with the chairman. We are only refering to his personal comment where he was talking that if a burecrat do not act by sensing the wind, they are sidelined. So, he acted accordingly. He was the cabinet secretary for Khaleda Zia government. Again, when another government came which sent Khaleda Zia to jail, that same government made him the head of a consitutional post! What an expert in sensing the air! Ei na hole, servant of the republic? This is an example which deserves a olimpic gold medal)
 
 
If you thought some of the ideas are worth of your reading time, please forward it to others. If you have an ear to the columnists in regular traditional media, please forward it to them. If you have an ear to the journalists and news editors of the electronic media, discuss it with them. Hope they would look at the suggestions and give due diligence.
 
Thanks for your time,
Innovation Line

=======================================================
Note: This is a freelance column, published mainly in different internet based forums. This column is open for contribution by the members of new generation, sometimes referred to as Gen 71. If you identify yourself as someone from that age-group and want to contribute to this column, please feel free to contact. Thanks to the group moderator for publishing the article as Creative Commons contents.
 
Dear readers, also, if you thought the article was important enough so it should come under attention of the head of the government please forward the message to them. Email address for the Chief Advisor: feeedback@pmo.gov.bd_ or at http://www.cao.gov.bd/feedback/comments.php
 
 
Also send to your favourtie TV channel:
Channel i: http://www.channel-i-tv.com/contact.html
ATN Bangla: mtplive@atnbangla.tv_
NTV: info@ntvbd.com_
RTV: info@rtvbd.tv_
BTV: info@btv.gov.bd_
 
The more of you forward it to them, the less will be the need to go back to street agitation. Use ICT to practice democracy.
=========================================================== 
 
 

__._,_.___
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Yahoo! News

Get it all here

Breaking news to

entertainment news

Yahoo! Finance

It's Now Personal

Guides, news,

advice & more.

John McEnroe

on Yahoo! Groups

Join him for the

10 Day Challenge.

.

__,_._,___

[vinnomot] Turning to Islam -- African-American Conversion Stories

Turning to Islam -- African-American Conversion Stories

 

by Rose-Marie Armstrong

 

http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=2877

 

[Rose-Marie Armstrong, a freelance writer and development consultant, is also a fellow of the C. S. Lewis Institute In Annandale, Virginia. This article appeared in The Christian Century, July 12, 2003, p. 19-23. Copyright by The Christian Century Foundation; used by permission. Current articles and subscription information can be found at www.christiancentury.org This material was prepared for Religion Online by Ted and Winnie Brock.]

 

"I was searching for several years before I became a Muslim," says Abdus Salaam, a marketing specialist from Birmingham, Alabama. "I was baptized during this time in the Church of Christ. But I had questions. What bothered me were the white pictures of Jesus and Mary. In Islam we have no pictures, not even of the Prophet Muhammad. As a child I wondered if black and white people had a separate God!"

 

Salaam's story is familiar among African-American converts to Islam. While newfound faith is central to their stories, race and personal empowerment are also key parts of the narratives. The in-dignity of discrimination, unfortunately mirrored in Christian churches, haunts African-Americans.

 

The freedom that Khalid Abdul Kareem, a native of Washington, D.C., found in Islam feels right to him. "African-Americans have been disconnected and disenfranchised," says Kareem. "At about the age of 17 I realized that Islam wasn't racist. It established the nature of who I am, why I am here, and where I am going. I am the Creator's vice-regent; I have no boundaries. I was created by a loving God who has a purpose for me. I can go wherever I choose to take my abilities." Now 48, Kareem says, "Islam contains truth that is dependent only on God. It liberates us from man."

 

African-Americans make up about a third of the estimated 4 to 8 million Muslims in the U.S. -- conservatively, around 1.5 million, nearly 5 percent of all African-Americans. According to a poll conducted in 2001 by Muslims in the American Public Square (MAPS). 20 percent of African-American Muslims are converts while 80 percent were raised Muslim. More detailed information about Islam in the African-American community, however, is relatively scarce.

 

Robert Dannin has opened a new and fascinating perspective on the subject in his recently published book Black Pilgrimage to Islam. Using the methods of ethno-graphic research to collect his information, Dannin tells what he calls "conversion sagas" -- rich, unvarnished stories about individual African-American's journeys into Islam. He also traces the history of Islam among African-Americans by tying together such key developments as the formation of black fraternal lodges in the 18th and 19th centuries; Noble Drew Ali's 1913 organization of the Moorish Science Temple in Newark, New Jersey; the growth of various Islamic missionary and revivalist movements beginning in the 19th and continuing throughout the 20th centuries; and the conversion to Islam of be-bop jazz musicians who helped raise the faith's profile in the African-American community.

 

Dannin also introduces what he admits is a "taboo" subject: that a portion of "African-American society has always been unchurched," that African-American lodges have traditionally been centers of unchurched religious practices and beliefs," and that since the end of the civil rights era unchurched African-Americans "have been moving more rapidly toward Islam." Dannin contends that the "voice of the unchurched" has been repressed by the black church's command of African-American history.

 

The various movements, organizations and institutions of unchurched African-Americans, Dannin argues, constitute an alternative to and in some cases a subversion of the black church. Even in the post-Reconstruction era black fraternal lodges "clearly threatened the African-American church's monopoly of social and civic life." Similarly, Islam, in all of its forms within the black community has offered an option for those who "thirst for an alternative to the church."

 

African-American Muslims I spoke with consistently explained Islam's appeal in terms of four benefits: a new sense of personal empowerment; a rigorous call to discipline; an emphasis on family structure and values; and a clear standard of moral behavior. But negative comments about Christianity and its associations with slavery and discrimination regularly accompany their expressions of gratitude to Islam, suggesting that Dannin's "alternative" hypothesis deserves consideration. Read between the lines and it's hard not to conclude that for many African-Americans an added appeal of Islam is that it's not Christianity.

 

"Humans serve their highest and best interest by serving God, which is characterized by building their own lives," says Abdul Mallek Mohammad, a spokesman for the leader of the Muslim American Society, W. Deen Muhammad. Mohammad argues that slavery took away African-Americans' ability to properly serve God, even though they lived in a Christian culture. God ordains "freedom, equality, justice and peace," and so "provides a foundation for life and the stability of community," he says. But blacks in this country have been deprived of this divinely authorized foundation. "African-Americans' history bears out that their humanity was not valued. Even now, there are pockets of racism in America that question the humanity of black people."

 

W. Deen Muhammad, one of the most eminent Muslim leaders in America, is the son of Elijah Muhammad, the longtime head of the Nation of Islam (NOI) who died in 1975. The elder Muhammad built a strong following that elevated both the emotional and material status of black men and women. Known as the Black Muslims, the members of this movement recruited from among the disadvantaged, welcoming ex-inmates as brothers wronged by a system of oppression. Malcolm X, who later converted to orthodox Islam, is the most notable example. Muhammad also established businesses and put men in black suits, white shirts and black bow ties. His organization, which began in the 1930s, was strongly anti-white. It is now led by Louis Farrakhan -- albeit with what Farrakhan says are major changes in philosophy.

 

W. Deen Muhammad broke completely with the NOI, forming his own orthodox Sunni Islamic movement. It is now the largest community of Muslim African-Americans, numbered at 200,000. The NOI doesn't release statistics but is said to number anywhere from 50,000 to 100,000.

 

Dannin seeks to break the widespread sense that the NOI is the dominant form of Islam within the African-American community. It's a mistake, Dannin says, portray "a single, notorious example as representative of the entire religious movement," especially when the NOI under Elijah Muhammad "resembled Islam only to the extent of its taboo against alcohol and pork." The practice of orthodox Islam has a long history among African-Americans, Dannin argues, and deserves to be understood on its own terms.

 

Eric Erfan Vickers, former executive director of the American Muslim Council in Washington, D.C., says that orthodox Islam today is "irresistible to African-Americans" because "they are a deeply spiritual people." Yet "Islam has a strong call to social justice -- Malcolm personified this."

 

Vickers, who has been a Muslim for more than 20 years, says, "You have African-American men seeking liberation, and many see Christianity as a white man's religion that continues to oppress. But God in his infinite wisdom created many religions."

 

Significantly, all of the African-American Muslims who shared their stories with me turned out to be from Christian homes -- a few even have family members who were or are clergy. Behija Abdus Salaam, a retired Department of Corrections chaplain and a member of the Interfaith Conference of Washington, D.C., states, "My grandfather started the first Baptist church in Manassas, Virginia, in the 1880s." Her oldest brother was also a pastor. Now in her 60s, Behija became a Muslim many years ago. Her doubts about Christianity began when, as a child, she attended services with her uncle, who was so light-skinned he could pass for white. When she entered the church holding his hand an usher pushed himself between them and said she couldn't sit up front with her uncle.

 

"Many of my family members are Muslims now," says Behija. An older brother first joined the Moorish Science Temple, a small Islamic sect with Masonic roots. Later he affiliated with the Nation of Islam. Other family members soon followed, but eventually left the NOI to join the Muslim American Society.

 

Some students of Islam believe that many African-American's ancestral Islamic heritage is one of the reasons why they turn from Christianity to Islam. Dannin writes that 15 percent of slaves shipped to North America came from Islamic regions of Africa and were themselves Muslims. The faith, which was suppressed principally to thwart rebellion, is resurfacing in complex ways, he believes.

 

While this may be true, Amiri YaSin Al-Hadid, co-author with Lewis V. Baldwin and Anthony P. Pinn of Between Cross and Crescent: Christian and Muslim Perspectives on Malcolm and Martin (University Press of Florida), says, "Historically, Islam in the United States is largely a 20th-century phenomenon, and is associated with the urban areas of the North, Midwest, and more recently the West Coast and the South." Al-Hadid chronicled the life of Malcolm X while Baldwin documented the viewpoint of Martin Luther King Jr. They suggest that it was Malcolm's militancy, not his Muslim beliefs, that made him a hero. But clearly part of Malcolm's legacy is his identification of Islam as a pathway to power.

 

Young black men seeking empowerment and self-determination are drawn to Islam despite the negative Image projected by the extremists of 9/11. By living according to the precepts of Islam they counter white America's stereotype of black men as on drugs, out of work or in jail. A commitment to discipline and industry structures their lives; family and community become rewarding responsibilities; moral behavior is required, charity is a duty Islam ordains, defines, clarifies and mandates. "It's a complete way of life," its followers like to point out -- a way of life that bestows pride on a man and gives a woman security.

 

If Islam is a path not only to God but also to self-respect for young black men, what about black women? Do they feel complete in a religious institution that teaches deference to men and the priority of wifely duties, and that prescribes a dress code that may include a burka? A visit to Masjid Mohammad on Washington's New Jersey Avenue helps answer these questions. A happy camaraderie unites the women there, as it does the men. Over 125 men and some 100 women attended the Friday lunch and prayer service I attended. Visitors are welcome. Several women cuddle babies in their arms in a small anteroom at the back of the main hall, chatting and laughing softly. Others come through the back door and sit on the floor or on chairs. The men enter from another door, moving well to the front, standing, bowing, kneeling and praying. Women pray or chat in an atmosphere of community and acceptance.

 

A speaker gives a short talk on stress, hypertension among blacks, and the benefits of fasting. Sherifah Alaimeen Rafiq, a Sunni Muslim who works for the Muslim American Society attends the mosque as often as possible, although women are excused to attend to family responsibilities. She arrives late, hugs babies and leaves without entering the main hall. The busy nursery and kids' school classes normally found in churches are absent here. These sisters and their children draw quietly together, enjoying their shared Muslim Identity.

 

For women, choosing Islam means gaining new power in their communities and in their lives. They are attracted to the movement because Islam gives them clearly defined rights, respect as women and the prospect of a family unit headed by a dependable male. Most of the women I talked to believe that these ideals are not stressed enough in Christianity.

 

For many Muslim women, the benefits of Islam overshadow what many American women would view as Islam's privileging of males. According to the Qur'an, a man is entitled to four wives if he can treat them all equally, and he may in certain circumstances administer corporal punishment. Some of the women I spoke with acknowledged these practices, but one woman said they are mischaracterized. "In the Hadith, which tells us how Muhammad himself lived -- and he is our example -- we see that he treated his wives gently and respectfully. He may have corrected them, but he would not harm them."

 

Harm may be suffered in other ways, however, as Dannin reports. Some of his conversion stories detail the emotional struggles faced by African-American Muslim women and broach the issue of polygamy which Dannin concedes is one of "the most controversial topics" among African-American Muslims. Dannin tells of Naima Saif'ullah, for example, who "found her experiment in Islamic plural marriage had become a nightmare." A former drug addict who married five times as a Muslim -- once into a polygamous arrangement -- Naima blames her mosque's religious leaders for not being more vigilant in overseeing her choice of a mate. Despite her "unsuccessful marriages and her failure at polygamy" Dannin observes, Naima Saif'ullah has not lost her faith in Islam "precisely because she sees herself not as a convert to some monolithic patriarchal Islam but as a serious professional woman who has chosen to accept Islam as a moral compass for her life."

 

Dannin also writes of Aminah Ali, who converted to Islam in order to marry a Muslim. In her case, the marriage was called off because she learned that "being a Muslim wife implied a particular status that excluded her from camaraderie with her husband and his friends." Aminah eventually left the faith. Dannin says that Aminah was adamantly opposed to "the popular assertion that polygamy is truly a viable solution for the dearth of marriageable men among African-Americans."

 

Who would expect well-educated 25-year-old Sherifah, whom I met at the Masjid Mohammad and who speaks Mandarin Chinese and Arabic, to permit her husband to have another wife? Yet in a conversation with me she upheld plural marriage in principle. "In our community we say it's best to marry one, but we don't want to see another sister struggling [without resources]," she told me. "Some groups say you can put in the marriage contract that the husband cannot take a second wife. But, actually a lot of men marry a second wife." Speaking of her own upcoming marriage, Sherifah confides that she thinks it will be monogamous, since her fiancé was not born Muslim and is not, therefore, culturally attached to polygamy.

 

Dannin offers a nuanced and revealing discussion of polygamy that underscores how perplexing the issue is for Muslims themselves. Most orthodox Muslims believe in interpreting scripture along very strict lines, and the Qur'an does indeed permit polygamy. To forbid what scripture teaches is considered blasphemous. Yet Dannin points out that most Muslim leaders who "are concerned with propagating their faith in 20th-century America have minimized the importance of polygamy to Islam. Historically, this strategy amounts to accommodation with the dominant form of monogamy in a society where polygamy itself transgresses the definition of marriage. The general view of polygamy is that it is an institution alien to American culture and generally incompatible with modern society. If Muslim men are reluctant to admit this publicly, it is also because they avoid this very controversial issue among themselves."

 

Abdul Malek Muhammad, speaking for the Muslim American Society told me that the society strongly disapproves of plural marriages.

 

For Dannin, patriarchy, which in his view troubles all major world religions, is the deeper problem beneath polygamy. Fatima Mernissi, he observes, is one of the few scholars who has "waded boldly into the question of feminism and Islam" with books like Beyond the Veil.

 

None of the Muslim women I spoke with, however, were interested in feminist analysis. They enjoy the respect they receive from Muslim men, and many like the rules on modest dress and chastity. A younger crowd praised chaperoned and group dating.

 

Women also like the fact that no matter how much money they earn, they have no monetary responsibilities in the marriage. "That's because, should the man divorce a wife, she needs her own money," one member of the mosque told me. The clarity with which Islam defines the economic rights and responsibilities of women is appealing to African-American Muslim women, in contrast to what they see as the ambiguities of American society. How well it works in practice is another matter. Dannin sites numerous cases in which men failed to live up to their responsibilities. As in any community individual abuses cannot be blamed on the religion. The security and personal empowerment marriage promises Muslim women are only as dependable as the individual who makes the promise.

 

While Muslims are highly visible members of black communities, and non-Muslim African-Americans are growing more and more comfortable with their Muslim neighbors, the tensions that have historically characterized relations between Islam and the black church still exist. Some African-American pastors consider Islam a rival for the souls of black folks. But there are also plenty of mediating voices.

 

The possibility of strained relationships has moved Vance Ross, pastor of the First United Methodist Church of Hyattsville, Maryland, both to defend the inclusive and egalitarian nature of Christianity against charges that Christianity is a "white man's religion" and to insist that the members of his congregation have an accurate understanding of Islam.

 

Ross cannot imagine what could be more egalitarian than "that sacrificial act of Jesus in giving his life for the salvation of humankind. Everyone is equal at the foot of the cross. Discrimination doesn't live there. We need to be certain [that] people have a complete picture -- that they know it was the influence of Christianity that made It possible to free the slaves," he says. "They also need to know the entire history of Islam. Islam shouldn't be equated just with the Nation of Islam, or Osama bin Laden or Muslims who are selling slaves today."

 

Black Christian academics and pastors are well aware of the attraction of Islam for African-Americans, but many reject the idea that it represents a threat to Christianity. "The African-American Christian community does not need to be concerned about losing people to Islam," says Calvin O. Butts III, senior pastor of Harlem's Abyssinian Baptist Church and president of the College of Old Westbury in Long Island. "It will not happen. Christianity is without question the strongest religion in our community. Remember, the first nation to be fully Christianized was Ethiopia."

 

Eugene F. Rivers III, pastor of Azusa Christian Community Church in Boston, sees things differently. "We are losing young black men to Islam, and we need to research why this is happening." Rivers lays the responsibility on black churches. He wants to see them do five things: "Initiate a focused approach to the claims of Islam; make a political and cultural analysis of the unique impact of the Islamic evangelization of black males; approach Islam on theological and evangelical levels; assess the geopolitical and strategic implications of Islam in Africa and South Asia, since the fortunes of black people in the U.S. are informed by what happens to blacks elsewhere In the world; and, mount a major effort to investigate the success of Islam in prisons.

 

In a telephone conversation Dannin acknowledged the strain between the faiths, but he considers it manageable. He points out that African-American Christians vastly outnumber their Muslim brothers and sisters. According to a survey conducted by the Barna Research Group, over 19 million African-Americans identify themselves as "born-again Christians," a statistic that doesn't include those who identify with Christianity in other terms. Compare that figure to the number of African-American Muslims -- estimated at 1.5 million -- and the demographic "threat" seems remote at best.

 

Nevertheless, Dannin criticizes the black church for not living up to its call to moral leadership within the black community. "There is in the Christian churches a tolerance for the status quo," he states. "Christian groups fail to emphasize and defend what is right. People will follow whoever leads if [leaders] are doing what is right."

 

Islam is doing something right. Muslims are accepted, visible members of black communities. The man or woman on the street is unlikely to blame these neighbors for 9/11, or to associate them with last summer's sniper attacks in Maryland and Virginia. For their part, Muslims, at least publicly, shower compliments on Christianity acknowledging the importance of Jesus as a prophet but denying his deity. Still, Baldwin claims the calm is only on the surface. "Christians tolerate Muslims, but there is an underlying tension because of the theological differences." There has always been dialogue between the two groups, Baldwin states. "Interfaith dialogue is one of the main themes of Between Cross and Crescent. Martin and Malcolm believed in building bridges of understanding instead of building barriers," Yet the tension between leaders of the two religions remains.

 

Butts also emphasizes cooperation. He believes the African-American church should "embrace our Muslim brothers and sisters, first, because they are seeking God, and second, because we have problems in our community that we both have a major interest in solving. Remember what Malcolm said? "We don't catch hell in America because we are Democrats or Republicans, or Christians or Muslims; we catch hell in America because we're black." When we have concerns we must come together."

 

Some black church leaders believe that the black church should not only cooperate with Muslims but learn from them as well, especially when it comes to reaching black men. "Black churches challenge you emotionally, and maybe intellectually" Rivers said, "but Islam challenges a man spiritually, physically and intellectually." Like Islam, Rivers observes, the Church of God in Christ enjoys a large male membership because "it cultivates the image of manhood." Rivers maintains that "black churches will have to take a page out of Islam's playbook if they are going to engage young people." A former gang member, Rivers confesses to studying the strategies used by the NOI in its heyday. "My entire outlook was influenced by the Muslims," he admits. Rivers is now heavily involved in promoting church leadership in inner-city neighborhoods.

 

Robert Franklin, president emeritus of the Interdenominational Theological Center in Atlanta, thinks the church should pay close attention to what he sees as the three distinctive marks of Islam's appeal to African-Americans. "The political theology of Islam appeals to African-American activism the well-ordered spiritual life provides specific guidelines for prayer and for relationships to others; and the promotion of family values emphasizes male leadership. African-Americans feel the family is fragmented, mainly because black men are not fulfilling their role. In Islam the man is the provider," Franklin remarks. When Malcolm X presented Islam as an alternative, Franklin notes, black men responded because "Christianity failed to understand and satisfy what they were feeling but didn't say."

 

Butts acknowledges the empowerment, stability and privileges Islam brings to African-Americans and their communities. "I see men who are redeemed from prison and drugs, who are off the streets and running their own businesses, who are neat and clean. They even have a new name!" he exclaims.

 

Hafis Mahbub, a Pakistani Muslim missionary to "new" black Muslims in Brooklyn during the 1960s, offered an even more radical account of Islam's appeal to black Americans. In Dannin's words, Mahbub taught that in Islam "the struggle to achieve personal transformation was synonymous with the struggle for total social reform."


__._,_.___
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Yahoo! News

Fashion News

What's the word on

fashion and style?

Yahoo! Finance

It's Now Personal

Guides, news,

advice & more.

Yahoo! Groups

Familyographer Zone

Learn how to take

great pictures.

.

__,_._,___

[vinnomot] GM worry in Sri Lanka.

Hazards of Genetic Engineering
Editorial, Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka), 10 September 2008
http://www.dailymirror.lk/DM_BLOG/Sections/frmNewsDetailView.aspx?ARTID=25777

Genetic engineering (GE) is currently the largest human and ecological experiment in history.  GE enables scientists to manipulate the genes of all living things in ways that never occur in nature.  The new bio-technologies that manipulate the genes of micro-organisms including bacteria and viruses, seeds, fish, animals and humans are dogged by controversy and uncertainties. We do not have clear answers to many questions.

What does this mean for human, animal and plant health and safety?  How does it affect biodiversity, food security and environmental integrity?  How do we prevent scientific knowledge from being overshadowed by the greed of commercialism?    How do we prevent genetic engineering  being science driven to a business driven enterprise?  These are some of the fundamental questions that challenge society and those who govern and thus bear a major responsibility in making technological choices that impact on life itself.

Over the next two decades the US industry carried on research on GE and introduced the Flavr Savr tomato, engineered to delay softening and thus extend shelf life.  The biotechnology company was Calgene.  Flavr Savr tomato was the first commercial GE food in the world.  Some of the questions on the safety of GE foods mentioned above were aired when the Flavr Savr tomato came up for commercial approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), US.

Controversy dogged the approval process with scientists warning of potential health hazards that had not been properly explored.  Despite the limitation of the risk assessment, the FDA in approving the tomato also decided that subsequent GE goods would not require similar reviews. 

Worse, a voluntary consultation process replaced the formal approval by the FDA.  The industry's push to deregulate was successful.  Currently there is no mandatory labelling requirement for GE foods in the US even though more than 80 percent of polled consumers want it.

In contrast, the European Union has a strict bio-safety legislative framework in place which requires developers to submit a comprehensive risk assessment for GE foods prior to any commercialization.  Any approval is given for 10 years and is subject to review. There are labelling requirements for GE foods.

Today, even as the biotech and agricultural industry continue to aggressively push for commercialization of GE crops and food, evidence is emerging of risks and hazards.  The major concerns are the perils of GE Rice.

Rice feeds more than half the worlds population.  In much of Asia, including Sri Lanka, rice is the staple food.  China is the world's largest producer and consumer of rice.    But the discovery of GE rice, unapproved for human consumption, in Hubei province in China brought out the worst fears of critics that contamination of the food chain has occurred.  The Chinese government has not authorized GE rice for commercial planting.  Field tests have been permitted, to grow rice resistant to herbicides or producing endotoxins to kill insects and pests; but there have been cases of contamination by these unapproved varieties of Chinese rice and Chinese products in the market.  This led to the EU applying measures to deal with these unapproved products for example by testing products and removing contaminated products from the shelves.

Research carried out by Chinese scientists show that there are environmental risks such as gene flow from GE rice to wild and weedy relatives of rice, which could affect the weedy rice populations which are a problematic weed. These weeds pose an environmental threat and controlling them will be a major problem facing rice farmer.

At present GE rice is not commercially cultivated anywhere in the world although the US has deregulated two traits of rice resistant to herbicides.

Despite the apparent positive outlook for GE rice, serious concerns have been raised on its impact on human and animal health, the environment and socio-economic situations. It appears that GE rice research has so far outpaced safety considerations.Against this backdrop, many developing countries, including Sri Lanka, are lured into ambitions for a biotech future.    But these countries do not have the capacity to thoroughly assess these new technologies and to monitor GE plants and other organisms in the environment and food chain.  The Assistant Director General/Regional Representative of the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) of the UN Regional Office for Asia and The Pacific in 2004 advised that Asian Governments should move cautiously before approving commercial planting of GE rice.  He urged governments to undertake extensive risk assessment on food safety.



"The greatest threat of childhood diseases lies in the dangerous and ineffectual efforts made to prevent them through mass immunization.....There is no convincing scientific evidence that mass inoculations can be credited with eliminating any childhood disease."--Dr Robert Mendelsohn, M.D.


Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download.

__._,_.___
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Yahoo! News

Fashion News

What's the word on

fashion and style?

Yahoo! Finance

It's Now Personal

Guides, news,

advice & more.

Cat Fanatics

on Yahoo! Groups

Find people who are

crazy about cats.

.

__,_._,___