Vinnomot.Com : A Melting Pot of Alternative Opinions

Thursday, May 8, 2008

[vinnomot] Re: [Dahuk]: JaiJai DiN:Safiq Rehman handed over the wealth to BAL which he d got from BNP

Mr. Shafiq Rehman is the initiator of new version of jounalism turning the readers into writers and impressed the youth to their right ONUS to the nation.He had many other contributions specially to raise awareness about the standing of the women folk in a country where they live under soci-politico and religious coercion.

But he failed to know who is freind and who is foe. His close associates in connivence with out siders humiliated him during his departure to UK after 1/11. None of the so-call press freedom sentinenls like mutiar rohomon, mohfooz anom,riaz etc etc came to the rescue of such erudite and respected editor. But on the other hand these criminal jounalist went to aid the centurian rapist Manik of JU and many muderers of BAL bu just making total black out of the horror news.

To me the main fear is that the media bazar is gradually going in the hands of BAL and and their staunch followers which is a red signal for our future.

Faruque Alamgir

Shafique Ahmed <shafiqueah@yahoo.com> wrote:

I agree with Mr. Salahuddin Ayubi. Shafik Rehman is not only a true patriot, he has the courage to tell the truth no matter who is in front of him. It was proved many times. Also, not only him, his full team members are like him, telling the truth. Today's newspapers are completely biased, writing some parts and hiding some parts of the news. They think that publics are fool, eat whatever they write. JJD was exception (with Shafik Rehman).

Shafique Ahmed

Salahuddin Ayubi <s_ayubi786@yahoo.com> wrote:

I do not think that Mr. Islam is correct. I remember that during the rule of the Kutta Bhai Mr. Rahamns mother died and he came to dhaka for her funeral but he was not allowed in the country by the chamchas of our very dear kutta bhai. , he was truned back. His little magazine was banned and was not published for few years. I do not want t go into controversy as to if he was pro Indian or pro BAL or pro BNP. I have found him to be a true patriot, who always thoght of the wlefare of the country and its people..

      JJD was not owned by him major share belonged to Bashundhara group, because of tareks influence on this business house. After one eleven ownership went to the HRC group. Now if there is duiffernce of opinion betweeen the owner and the editor it is the editor who has to quit. That is what has happened . In the transfer of the wonership of the newspaper he had no hand..

              Salahuddin Ayubi

          Salahuddin Ayubi

--- On Thu, 5/8/08, Md. Aminul Islam <aminul_islam_raj@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Md. Aminul Islam <aminul_islam_raj@yahoo.com>
Subject: [Dahuk]: JaiJai DiN:Safiq Rehman handed over the wealth to BAL which he d got from BNP
To: alochona@yahoogroups.com, sonarbangladesh@yahoogroups.com, WideMinds@yahoogroups.com, notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com, banglarnari@yahoogroups.com, dahuk@yahoogroups.com, khabor@yahoogroups.com, chottala@yahoogroups.com, vinnomot@yahoogroups.com, notunbangladesh@yahoogroups.com, faruquealamgir@yahoo.com, ayubi_s786@yahoo.com, javediqbalkaleem@yahoo.com, dreamer_hillol@yahoo.com, chena_kew@yahoo.com, bdmailer@gmail.com, diagnose@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, May 8, 2008, 7:49 AM

Dear all,

              do u know who is this shafiq?

once he was a column writer in CPB owned weekly Sandhani.

In earshad regime he was in lime light with his Jaijai din. it was a BAL n CPB minded media which oppose the pro Bangladesh parties n supported the pro Indians.Even this Rehman wrote against Begum Zia n other prominent leaders in a very ugly manner.

He also wrote against late Mustaq n other leaders who was active against indian aggression.

But in before 2001 he changed his color and pretend to be a BNP supporter. He was able to attract the attention of begum Zia.He got some facilities including jai jai din complex.TV chunk and others.But still he n his wife Talea keep ties with Pro Indians.

He handed over Jai jai din complex to BAL Leader Saber'S brother Saeid Choudhury.

It is very natural for him.

Aminul Islam

Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

__._,_.___

Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[vinnomot] Re: [notun_bangladesh] Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow.The important thing is .

Mr. Gopal, Ayubi and Musfique

I am not surprised at the mail of Mr. Gopal since he has alignment to BAL and its political modus operendi. But I am shocked (hope he doesn't mind) at the comments of Mr. Gopal below :

Quote: "There are so many things to elaborate about Mr. Hazari but I would like to take a break as redaers might loose patience to read such long mail. I would like to write more if concerned quarters raise any question or require more information about the contribution of him" Unquote

The contribution of criminal Hazari

is that he is an expert in nailing the opponents and make several holes by using drilling machine, rape, murder, loot and arson in his kingdom of Fenai. Sometimes behaving as Marx by establishing class committee( he and his BAL knows what the Class committee is

??).

Hazari took Bangladeshi as fools as his mentors also thought !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

To let lose the mastans under him to terrorize anybody and everybody in the area.

Interestingly this ctiminal marauder is also a poet of BAL's likings . The famous literary feat of the hazari "Badhaner Phasi Chai" duly acclaimed by the BAL MP's in the Holy(???) Shangshad. May a Noble for him ?????? Shame Shame.

The sane people thinks that he is a slur "Kolonko" on human nature but fortunately very close to the heart of the Jono Netri Hasina who asked people to vote for him

Whatever written above is nothing of the writer but excerpts from the then news papers,electronics media like J.Konrho,P.Alo,Sangbad,ETV,ATN etc etc.

There is no denying the fact the there are many many sonar cheleysin BNP as well who are called Zia soinik. Just day before yesterday two chatradol high ups beat photo journalist in Bangla motor and even inside the police station in front of one Sub.Inspector "Peter Bhabi".
The crime of the poor photo journalist that they failed to give side to the
V VIP's car.

So, friends these are no less criminal than the great Hazari and other scores of Hajees of BAL . These Bongobondhu and Zia Soiniks are the real impediments in the smooth practice of democracy resulting in rise of tyrrany instead.

I am surprised to read that this hazari has feat of achievements. This must be a joke of the millennium.

I do not wish to read any achievements of the criminal of Hazari or any other political sentinels as I am very much aware of these criminal gangs acts as a conscious citizen.

To my opinion sane and concerned people should totally reject partisan politics since this is impeding the country to attain the most needed unity.
Unless we are united on a national consensus focusing the countries interest only and not worshipping the Chore and churnis we will be no where and turn as a subjugative Rajjya of the muscle power best neighbour which is the dream of very many quislings in Bangladesh.

SHOULD WE NOT AGREE THAT HASINA AND KHALEDA IS NOT BANGLADESH.

BANAGLADESH IS OF THE 15 CRORE PEOPLE WHO ARE LOOKING AT THE CONSCIOUS AND SANE POPULACE TO HELP THEM TO HEAVE A SIGH OF RELIEF TO LEAD A LIFE FREE FROM HUNGER,POVERTY,FEAR,GOONS AND CORRUPT POLITICS OF THEIR DESTINY.

PERSONALLY I HATE ALL THE TASTED SO-CALLED POLITICAL ELITES AND JIBIS N HATE TO WORSHIP ANYBODY WHOSOEVER IT IS BUT DO NOT HESITATE TO VALUE THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE NATION IF THAT HAS BROUGHT LAURELS INSTEAD OF MISERIES AND SERVITUDE IN DEFFERENT FORMS.

I have all the respect to Mr. Gopal for his personal opinion and value it but would humbly like to disagree on his political considerations.
My politics is Bangladesh not bloody BAL/BNP/JP/ or the hated Janwar Mosharraf Beai's Jamat.

BANGLADESH IS LIFE, MY DREAM, MY ASPIRATIONS AND MY SONGRAM SO AS YOU MY FRIENDS .

I WISH THE LAL SABUJ PATAKA TO FLY HIGH WITH RIGHT DIGNITY WITHOUT FEAR IN COMITY OF NATIONS.

Sincere regards and best wishes.

Faruque Alamgir

Salahuddin Ayubi <s_ayubi786@yahoo.com> wrote:

Nothing has changed.. Bengal had always been like this. Have you read the " BANGALI CHARITRO DUI SHOTO BOCHOR PURBE" firast published in the Desh of Calacutta and later reprinted in Bichitra of Dhaka some 25 years ago., gives a glimpse of bengali character as seen by the british civil servants in the late eighteenth century.

Salahuddin Ayubi

--- On Wed, 5/7/08, gopalsengupta@aol.com <gopalsengupta@aol.com> wrote:

From: gopalsengupta@aol.com <gopalsengupta@aol.com>
Subject: [notun_bangladesh] Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow.The important thing is .
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com, khabor@yahoogroups.com, notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com, vinnomot@yahoogroups.com, Diagnose@yahoogroups.com, uttorshuri@yahoogroups.com, hazarikaa@hotmail.com
Cc: ayubi_s786@yahoo.com, faruquealamgir@yahoo.com, chena_kew@yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, May 7, 2008, 8:18 AM

Dear Readers,

Attention:Mr. Salahuddin Ayubi, Mr. Faruque Alamgir & Mr. Musfique

Our whole concept of crime and corruption seems to have changed, if you look at the behaviour of our ruling class. If murderers, rapists, smugglers, black marketers, listed criminals and people widely accused of being in possession of ill-gotten money and property could walk about freely both in and outside the corridors of power, as they indeed did over the last three decades or so, did we not get the impression that what we generally condemn as crime and corruption were not precisely so in the eyes of the government?There is no denying that there was an unprecedented surge in crime and corruption in Bangladesh over the last sixteen years, especially during the rule of the immediate past BNP-Jamaat-e- Islami alliance government. Our country topped the list of the most corrupt countries in the world for four years in a row. Why we will blame only Mr. Joynal Hazari? If you think he was the mastermind of all of those misrules, then leave others and talk about his past who was the first person to try the worst war criminal and Feni chapter ICS leader as well as punish the son of Malek Ukil as well as punish those who tried to insult girls in his home district. I can strongly demand that 3 times elected JS member, he was never engaged in sex scandals as well as torturing journalists as mentioned in your mails. He was the Chairperson of the JS Youth and Sports sub committee during the tenure of AL government and assisted the Bangladesh Cricket team to get the highest prestigious position the World Cricket. There are so many things to elaborate about Mr. Hazari but I would like to take a break as redaers might loose patience to read such long mail. I would like to write more if concerned quarters raise any question or require more information about the contribution of him.

Please learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning.

Will this government bow down before the dark forces of crime and corruption, or will it go ahead with its pro- democracy and pro-people reform package? This is the million-dollar question.

Gopal Sengupta

Canada

Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

__._,_.___

Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[vinnomot] Joruri obostha niye kisu kotha - a humble opinion to the nation

Joruri obostha niye kisu kotha - a humble opinion to the nation
Ei oboshtha jemon amra keo chaini, tao eshechhilo; temni eta amra na chailei chole jabe na. Jokhon somoi hobe, tokhon emni emni chole jabe.

Sub-headline er tone ta shune nishchoi apnara vabchhen, manush chaileo jabe na, tahle kokhon jabe? Kaar ichcha te joruri oboshtha eshechhilo, aar kaar ichcha te jabe?

No, we didn't mean that way. Rather what we meant that is this:
Joruri obostha eshechhilo, karon joruri oboshtha jari korar moto obostha hoyesilo. Keo keo hoitu rajnitik der ejonno dayi korben. Kintu aaj dosh khujbo na. Eta tu sotti je - oboshtha khub kharap hoyesilo. Sekhan theke mukti paoya giyesilo - joruri oboshthar jonno. Ekhon jei kotha ta keo bolse na, asha kori Mr. Chief Adviser bolben, seta hoitese - joruri oboshtha jari hobar karon gulu ki chole gese? Amader tu mone hoi na.

Taile eto sob alap keno. Dr. Fakhruddin and his team jodi ashol karon dur na kore joruri oboshtha tular jonno President ke suparish koren, taile tar jonno unara e dayi thakben - if that turn out to be a wrong decision.

Amra mone kori joruri oboshtha tular chinta kora bhul hobe. Joruri oboshtha jari korar ashol karon gulu ekhono strongly ase. Eto tara tari eto jotil problem solve kora jaina. Amra aro mone kori je, December 08 er moddye election korar jonno legal bindings nai. Eta ekta promise - a political promise from a non-political government. Unara ei promise ta kore vhul koresilen - they had no idea how long it might take to fix the problem.

Off course, apnara prosno korte paren, what do we mean by fixing the problem? Khubi khati prosno. Kokhon amra bolbo je "sob kisu ekhon thik hoyese"? How to measure that the situation has improved to some acceptable level so that the emergency can be lifted?

Eta ekta lakh taka'r prosno. Ei prosner uttor amra jani na. Amra etao mone kori je - Dr. Fakhruddin and his team also do not know the answer to this question. If they presume to know the answer to that question, they will make another mistake. Hope they do not do that.

So, ekhon ki kora?

Onek din theke vabsilam. Upai ta ki?

We think we know the answer to some extant - though apnader eta posondo nao hote pare. Somadan ta ei rokom:

This caretaker government came (which we prefer to call an interim government) to take responsibility in a mix of two constitutional situation. It was a period of transition when a caretaker government should be in place. However, it was a time when the President also declared emergency, too. And it was at a time when there is no parliament in place.

The constitution didn't foresee such a combination of two special situation and it do not give any direction about how to proceed in such a case.

So, we have to go to the basics - the doctrine of necessity.

Using that principle, what take precedence - a transition period or a emergency period? It certainly should be emergency period. If we accept that premise, then:

The emergency period, in the absence of a parliament, would be in place until one month after a new parliament is in place - that is what our constitution says. Now, other experts might have different opinion, but that is the most direct and plain interpretation.

And this interpretation is also helpful to solve our problem that we are talking about in this article.

If the current government do not touch the emergency power rules (just relax it so the election campaign can be held with "reasonable" openness), that would be a better option.

Let the politicians be elected to the parliament and a new parliament will be formed in due time.

Then there will be a one month window after the election for the elected MPs to decide whether the situation hasn't improved yet. If they do nothing, emergency will go away 30 days after the parliament sits for the first time. But if they think the situation is still bad, they can extend the tenure of emergency as needed basis. Leave the ultimate decision about emergency upto the politicians - which would be wise and democratic decision.

Emergency situation was created by the politicians. Let the politicians again to decide whether its time to lift the emergency.

If you thought some of the ideas are worth of your reading time, please forward it to others. If you have an ear to the columnists in regular traditional media, please forward it to them. If you have an ear to the journalists and news editors of the electronic media, discuss it with them. Hope they would look at the suggestions and give due diligence.

Thanks for your time,
Innovation Line

=================================================================

Note: This is a freelance column, published mainly in different internet based forums. This column is open for contribution by the members of new generation, sometimes referred to as Gen 71. If you identify yourself as someone from that age-group and want to contribute to this column, please feel free to contact. Thanks to the group moderator for publishing the article.

Dear readers, also, if you thought the article was important enough so it should come under attention of the head of the government please forward the message to them. Email address for the Chief Advisor: feeedback@pmo.gov.bd_ or at http://www.cao.gov.bd/feedback/comments.php . The more of you forward it to them, the less will be the need to go back to street agitation. Use ICT to practice democracy. It is already proven that this government responds to the feedback.

Also send to your favourtie TV channel:

Channel i: http://www.channel-i-tv.com/contact.html
ATN Bangla: mtplive@atnbangla.tv_
NTV: info@ntvbd.com_
RTV: info@rtvbd.tv_

BTV: info@btv.gov.bd_

=================================================================

__._,_.___

Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[vinnomot] Clinton's Five Mistakes [TIME]

The Five Mistakes Clinton Made

By KAREN TUMULTY [TIME.com]

For all her talk about "full speed on to the White House," there was an unmistakably elegiac tone to Hillary Clinton's primary-night speech in Indianapolis. And if one needed further confirmation that the undaunted, never-say-die Clintons realize their bid might be at an end, all it took was a look at the wistful faces of the husband and the daughter who stood behind the candidate as she talked of all the people she has met in a journey "that has been a blessing for me."

It was also a journey she had begun with what appeared to be insurmountable advantages, which evaporated one by one as the campaign dragged on far longer than anyone could have anticipated. She made at least five big mistakes, each of which compounded the others:

1. She misjudged the mood
That was probably her biggest blunder. In a cycle that has been all about change, Clinton chose an incumbent's strategy, running on experience, preparedness, inevitability - and the power of the strongest brand name in Democratic politics. It made sense, given who she is and the additional doubts that some voters might have about making a woman Commander in Chief. But in putting her focus on positioning herself to win the general election in November, Clinton completely misread the mood of Democratic-primary voters, who were desperate to turn the page. "Being the consummate Washington insider is not where you want to be in a year when people want change," says Barack Obama's chief strategist, David Axelrod. Clinton's "initial strategic positioning was wrong and kind of played into our hands." But other miscalculations made it worse:

2. She didn't master the rules
Clinton picked people for her team primarily for their loyalty to her, instead of their mastery of the game. That became abundantly clear in a strategy session last year, according to two people who were there. As aides looked over the campaign calendar, chief strategist Mark Penn confidently predicted that an early win in California would put her over the top because she would pick up all the state's 370 delegates. It sounded smart, but as every high school civics student now knows, Penn was wrong: Democrats, unlike the Republicans, apportion their delegates according to vote totals, rather than allowing any state to award them winner-take-all. Sitting nearby, veteran Democratic insider Harold M. Ickes, who had helped write those rules, was horrified - and let Penn know it. "How can it possibly be," Ickes asked, "that the much vaunted chief strategist doesn't understand proportional allocation?" And yet the strategy remained the same, with the campaign making its bet on big-state victories. Even now, it can seem as if they don't get it. Both Bill and Hillary have noted plaintively that if Democrats had the same winner-take-all rules as Republicans, she'd be the nominee. Meanwhile, the Clinton campaign now acknowledges privately:

3. She underestimated the caucus states
While Clinton based her strategy on the big contests, she seemed to virtually overlook states like Minnesota, Nebraska and Kansas, which choose their delegates through caucuses. She had a reason: the Clintons decided, says an adviser, that "caucus states were not really their thing." Her core supporters - women, the elderly, those with blue-collar jobs - were less likely to be able to commit an evening of the week, as the process requires. But it was a little like unilateral disarmament in states worth 12% of the pledged delegates. Indeed, it was in the caucus states that Obama piled up his lead among pledged delegates. "For all the talent and the money they had over there," says Axelrod, "they - bewilderingly - seemed to have little understanding for the caucuses and how important they would become."

By the time Clinton's lieutenants realized the grave nature of their error, they lacked the resources to do anything about it - in part because:

4. She relied on old money
For a decade or more, the Clintons set the standard for political fund-raising in the Democratic Party, and nearly all Bill's old donors had re-upped for Hillary's bid. Her 2006 Senate campaign had raised an astonishing $51.6 million against token opposition, in what everyone assumed was merely a dry run for a far bigger contest. But something had happened to fund-raising that Team Clinton didn't fully grasp: the Internet. Though Clinton's totals from working the shrimp-cocktail circuit remained impressive by every historic measure, her donors were typically big-check writers. And once they had ponied up the $2,300 allowed by law, they were forbidden to give more. The once bottomless Clinton well was drying up.

Obama relied instead on a different model: the 800,000-plus people who had signed up on his website and could continue sending money his way $5, $10 and $50 at a time. (The campaign has raised more than $100 million online, better than half its total.) Meanwhile, the Clintons were forced to tap the $100 million - plus fortune they had acquired since he left the White House - first for $5 million in January to make it to Super Tuesday and then $6.4 million to get her through Indiana and North Carolina. And that reflects one final mistake:

5. She never counted on a long haul
Clinton's strategy had been premised on delivering a knockout blow early. If she could win Iowa, she believed, the race would be over. Clinton spent lavishly there yet finished a disappointing third. What surprised the Obama forces was how long it took her campaign to retool. She fought him to a tie in the Feb. 5 Super Tuesday contests but didn't have any troops in place for the states that followed. Obama, on the other hand, was a train running hard on two or three tracks. Whatever the Chicago headquarters was unveiling to win immediate contests, it always had a separate operation setting up organizations in the states that were next. As far back as Feb. 21, Obama campaign manager David Plouffe was spotted in Raleigh, N.C. He told the News & Observer that the state's primary, then more than 10 weeks away, "could end up being very important in the nomination fight." At the time, the idea seemed laughable.

Now, of course, the question seems not whether Clinton will exit the race but when. She continues to load her schedule with campaign stops, even as calls for her to concede grow louder. But the voice she is listening to now is the one inside her head, explains a longtime aide. Clinton's calculation is as much about history as it is about politics. As the first woman to have come this far, Clinton has told those close to her, she wants people who invested their hopes in her to see that she has given it her best. And then? As she said in Indianapolis, "No matter what happens, I will work for the nominee of the Democratic Party because we must win in November." When the task at hand is healing divisions in the Democratic Party, the loser can have as much influence as the winner.

=======

View this article on Time.com

[vinnomot] Interview of a Street-dog (Nerikutta): Who will wake Bangladesh up?

Hello,

I found another fabulous article about an Interview of a street dog (Nerikutta) what is a continuation of last 2 interviews taken by Shafik Rehman.

Please click the link below:

http://www.sonarbangladesh.com/story/neri_kutta_shahin.pdf

Regards,

Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

__._,_.___

Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[vinnomot] US Congress Hosted a Reception-BASHI Participated

http://www.voanews.com/bangla/2008-05-07-voa1.cfm

Dear All:

Great News for the Bangladeshi Americans and for the Worldwide Bangladeshi!

First time in the history of the US Senate Building: A Bangladeshi dance was performed!

Members of the US Congress Hosted a Reception for the first time in the history to Celebrate Asian Pacific American Heritage Month where Bangladeshi American Society for Humanity, Inc. (BASHI) participated.

Maryland APA Commissioner Mr. Anis Ahmed, Deputy Chief of Bangladesh Embassy Mr. Sk. Mohammed Belal and Board Members of the BASHI were present at the reception.

Bangladeshi dance was performed by Ms. Sumaiya Chowdhury and organized by Mr. Rezaul and Mrs. Rubina Karim of Baltimore, Maryland.

Please go to the following linkage to read today's news and listen to the Voice of America's recorded Live Broadcast from the US Senate Building. Mrs. Roquia Haider, famous broadcast journalist of the Voice of America reported the live broadcast news from the US Senate Building. Also open attachments to see photos of the event.

http://www.voanews.com/bangla/2008-05-07-voa1.cfm

http://www.voanews.com/mediaassets/bangla/2008_05/Audio/ra/Bangla_rh_heritage_6may08.ra

http://web.mac.com/perrynerantzis/Asian-Pacific_Americans/bangladesh.html