"a bus can carry at least 40 people (seated) and a car can carry 4 only (excluding driver), to carry 10 times people (40), 10 cars occupies at least 4 times space compared to a bus" it may sound crazy, but may help in some ways by increasing gas, octane and petrol prices keeping the diesel price unchanged (to help market price).
gas: 1. major portion of the cars are run by gas and these cars transport only 10-20% of the travellers, if they are capable enough why not make them pay more when most of the population are yet to have gas supply at their home? 2. this additional amount may be used to develop gas system and provide gas to the deceived. 3. this way, we can check misuse of national resource and ensure longer availability (thus energy security), i have seen people drive out unnecessarily considering cheap energy. 3. this creates heavy traffic, polution and wastage of valuable time. octane & petrol: 1. those who run on liquid fuel are likely to represent wealthy portion of the population. 2. they administer corruption, don't pay tax, enjoy being loan defaulter, deprive the workers with bare minimum pay (also irregularly, tk 1650/month could be enough in the 80's) 3. liquid fuel costs us foreign currency, and for which portion of the population government is spending? 4. they should me made pay a premium, this additional amount may be used to subsidize other sectors or recover BPC's deficit 5. either they will pay the premium of limit usage, therby limit polution, traffic and save foreign currency some may say, it will affect economic growth, well, there are other factors affecting economic growth, why count on fuel price only? and people will be habituated to any price level of fuel, look around, are we not living with market price hike on daily comodeties? nb: i run my car by liquid fuel only oooooops, but that is because i dont prefer to waste time on filling station que and i do limit my usage to minimum possible, for rest movement i take bus, rickshaw or just walk.
--- On Sun, 9/14/08, Saiful Alam <shovan1209@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Saiful Alam <shovan1209@yahoo.com>
Subject: [dhakamails] Private cars in Dhaka published on the daily star
To: notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com, chottala@yahoogroups.com, bangla_ict@yahoogroups.com, bangla-vision@yahoogroups.com, banglarnari@yahoogroups.com, dhakamails@yahoogroups.com, alochona@yahoogroups.com, "car free" <info@worldcarfree.net>, carfree@lifesupportproductions.co.uk
Date: Sunday, September 14, 2008, 11:47 AM
| Dear all Today the daily star publish " Privat cars in dhaka" www.thedailystar. net/story. php?nid=54632 | Private cars in Dhaka
Let us return to the private car. Whatever convenience and comfort it provides comes at various costs. Cars are the main source of pollutants worldwide. There is no such thing as a clean car; cars just vary in the amount they pollute. Despite increasingly stringent emissions control standards over the decades in the US, cars pollute more than they used tobecause people are driving more. It is difficult for us to appreciate just how much cars pollute. The air in Dhaka city, after all, improved dramatically after the banning of two-stroke baby taxis, and again with the introduction of unleaded fuel. However, this is by no means an indication that the air in Dhaka is clean. Any trip to the countryside is a reminder of the pleasure of breathing clean air. Even in Dhaka, if we wake up early and take a walk, we can experience a bit of the pleasure of fresh air as each car passes, we can also understand just how much each car pollutes the air. As the streets fill with cars, the pollution rises. On hartal days, despite large numbers of people moving about the city, the air is fresh and the city (violence aside) is quiet. Carsand the wide paved roads needed to accommodate themalso emit a great deal of heat, making Dhaka even more insufferable in the many hot months. Cars also are the main cause of noise pollution. A full 97% of students in Dhaka in a survey on noise pollution said that their studying is disrupted by car horns; 96% of the general public interviewed mentioned car horns as the main cause of noise pollution in Dhaka.[1] When rickshaws were on strike in October 2004, there were no rickshaws on the streets, yet the streets were as noisy as ever. We would argue that since cars only transport roughly 10-20% of travellers, they should only have access to 10-20% of road space, for moving and parkingand should respect the rest of users, as well as the right to some peace and quiet of all the people working and living next to roads. Presumably, one component of civilization is respecting the rights of others. The attitude of driverswho represent the wealthiest portion of societythat they alone should have full access to roadsis anti-democratic, anti-civilization, and disturbingly elitist. A society in which people fail to respect the rights of others, and in which the rich believe they should have special privileges on the roads as well as in every other aspect of life, is a society destined to fall into crime, selfishness, viciousness, and lack of the neighbourly friendliness that allows people to live comfortably together. | | Syed Saiful Alam, Volunteer of Save Environment Movement
| |
