I wonder how then AL highlighted Suhrawardy a non-Bengali and who did not have 25% control over Bangla language plus with no respect to modern democracy as "Gonotontrer Manosh Putra". You are right that he was not the only quisling favouring Pakis there were many many others in the form of politicians e.g.Muslim League/ poets/ journalist/bureaucr
Under
The tragedy is that quisling were there and still are there and they are the main impediments in getting the right system to steer our nation since their allegiance was neither E.P nor Bangladesh. For last 37 years we are criticizing and counter criticizing over the Mukti Judhdha and divide the nation on stupid phenomenon of "Chetona". Interestingly the flag of Chetona is carried by people who were mostly collaborators of then regime and did not have an iota of contribution to the Mukti Judhdha.
Mukti Judhdha was fought by the ordinary people, students and peasant and fought the WAR without and any direction from any party or individual. The fought spontaneously and without and without any lust to become "Kotipoti" rather they dreamt to see their beloved "LAL SABUJ PATAKA' to fly high in the open sky with right dignity. After the defeat of the bestial Pakis and the Janwar Razakars they real freedom fighters were sidelined by the bourgeois politicians of BAL who snatched their pride of shedding blood for the nation.This is begining of the decaying era of the nation at the budding stage.
To me our politics and politician instead of contributing to the augment of country's development rather pushed it backward causing the nation to suffer and suffer. The politicians successfully administer the opium in the vein of it's die-hard supporters and force them dance ,tilt,loot, arson,destroy property and hold the economy at ransom.
So, in my opinion of calling Bangladesh a "Failed State" by the detractors they should scold the incompetent politicians who are responsible for all pain of the nation not Bangladesh. But fortunately things are changing that there is drastic change in the awareness of the people about the wrong doing of the politicians. This is a very positive sign and will have a good effect in the upcoming election(?).
Faruque Alamgir
PS: I love to tell spade a spade no matters who things what.This the duty of the conscious people to let the general public know about the real face our "Jonogon Premiks" politicians. No matter whether it is BAL/BNP/JP/JAMAT and the lezur chamcha small pimp political parties. May be because of your political allegiance/likings my writing is sour to you but I cannot help it. Please let every citizen fell free to express what s/he feels right. One may disagree but that should not be mooted as Engr. Shafiq a die hard BAL activist does in an obnoxious/obscene way.
Faruque Alamgir
Mr. Faruque AlamgirI agree with your contention that Suhrawardy had betrayed thecause of the autonomy of people he represented [currently Bangladesh].However he was not an exception: As I read in history, starting from KhajwaNazimuddin to Mohammad Ali Bogura sold the interest of the people of eastto the ruling elites of Pakistan. In those days Khodoker Mustaq andone Jahiruddin was the leading cronies of Suhrawardy.However, I could not find which constituency in the east Suhrawardygot elected & and actually represented whom. I don't thinkhe had any home base in Bangladesh ......[If you have any authetentic infoon this, please enlighten us. I also heard that Suhrawardy was not fluentin Bangla.... Is that true or just a rumor?]It must be remembered here that Awami League was never a Monolithic ideologybased political party. After the death of Suhrawardy in 1963.there was two distincttrend in Awami League: One circled around NDF [National Democratic Front - a leaderonly parlor based organization of the big name politicians] and the othercircled around Sheikh Mujibur Rahman ..... Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's AwamiLeague was qualitatively different from Suhrawardy's party. That was thereason Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was not acceptable to the ruling Junta of Pakistan.Just yesterday [July 23, 2008] one Mister Sajjad Anwar commented in Notun Bang;adeshforum that:"These thugs were the cause of the separation of East Pakistan as well. They were
afraid that Mujib-ur-Rehmnan will bring about land reforms in Pakistan, like in
India." [Ref:http://groups.yahoo.com/ ]group/notun_ bangladesh/ message/15405 If you think that the ordinary masses and rural people are Bangladesh, then no"pro Bangladeshi Party" exist...... Anyone who goes to power install their own"get rich quick" scams, ignoring the real interest of the masses. All the jargons ofpatriotism, national interest and development that we hear are political ploys andslogan mongering,,,, However, I am sure that the things will change. I am an optimist about abright future fot the mass people of Bangladesh: THE DAY SHALL DAWN ......Syed AslamHi there,
:You sounds like a broken record when you talk about BALWhy do you talk about things repetively but not clearly?: THANKS!Ayed AslamOn 7/24/08, Faruque Alamgir <faruquealamgir@gmail.com > wrote:
Can anybody stop this most prudent and "Shob junta" professor?? Man listen, Suhrawardi is a name who championed in treachery to the cause of people of then East Pakistan. He was sent to become PM on the condition that E. pakis demand of majority share on the basis of population for which vowed to shed his blood but sitting in the Masnad (Takth) he did the opposite by putting final nail by agreeing to parity.
It is crystal clear that BAL was never and is not and will not be pro Bangladeshi Party since it serves their fathers(mentors) interest. Continuous silence against the killing of Bangladeshis by their father(BSF) Indi is the real proof of betrayal character of BAL.
Plus we did not hear anything from the sanes (who complained about indecency by gang of four) about the continuous posting in obscene language by one BAL activist Eng.Shafiq (Arif & sometime in guise of women's name). I personally requested to give their comment but but the sane people abstained since it is the creation of their party's activists. Is it correct then that "chorey chorey mastuto bhai !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Faruque Alamgir
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@gmail.com > wrote:
Mr. Salahuddin AyubiFinally, you have proved yourself to be an ego maniac who is alwaysdeclares himself to be a winner [You are a self-proclaimed winner.]You and your buddies have created an atomosphere of intimidation. slanderand abusive name calling, where meaningful debate has become almostimpossible .....We all know that Mujib was not a revolutionary leader like Mao Ts Tungor Che Gueaverra but a popular mass leader of a political party that won 1970election.There is a inherent connection between the need of the people and the leaderof the masses in any historical epoch. Mujib's historical 7th march speechsummerizes his trust on the people of Bangladesh that achieved their independencethrough a lagacy of Blood:Mujib's dialog with Yahia [not gossips as you slanderously call] and Mujib's arreston the night of March 25th 1971 gave an extra degree of legitimacy to the cause ofBangladesh's fight for independence in the international level. Mujib was in Pakistanijail for nine months with Hangman's rope above his head. Mujib didn't surrender orcompromise even under the threat of death ..... that was the strength of Mujib's character.Husayn Sahid Suhrawardi was a mentor of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman.Sahid Suhrawardi was acceptable to Paki Junta to some degree but Mujib wasnot. ...... the rest is history .... but the history must be understood in the propercontext ... all attempts distort and falsify our history will be resisted by thepeople of Bangladesh.You are right, "In September 1971 US mission in Calcutta establishedcontact with Mushtaq to promote a negotiated settlement with Pakistan."Your attempts to glorify your mentor Khandoker Mustaq is out and outobnoxious. Mustaq's conspiracy to sabtage Bangladesh's fight for statehoodand independence has failed [Mustaq was conspiring for a compromise ona formula to create a confederation with Pakistan with the help of Nixon Admn]You have declared your narrow partisan political agenda: You want to prove yourfalsified version of history condoning crimes of Jamaate Islami the traitors &collaborators of Pakistan army and the Genocide of 1971 along with its gestapos[albodors etc] ....All your attempts to falsify history is bound to fail .....You and your cohorts canfool all Bangladeshis for some times, few Bangladeshis for all times ...... but notall Bangladeshis for all times....... Bangladeshis will overcome the attempts tofalsify the true histrory of this nation and march farward: for the people ofBangladesh: THE DAY SHALL DAWN ......The sequence of events must be understood & analyzed in the proper historicalcontext. One thing in history leads to next ....... histrory does not follow any scriptwritten in the palaces and barracks...... Masses are the makers of history and exactly that's what happened during the emergence of People's Republic of BangladeshMan proposes but Almighty Allah disposes..... as always ..... Syed Aslam
On 7/23/08, Salahuddin Ayubi <s_ayubi786@yahoo.com > wrote:Aslam Sahib,
Now that you have no answer to my queries you are trying to divert the issues and open new ground to beat me . Mr. Aslam you have already lost the battle. whatever tctics you now adopt will not help you to gain the lost ground. keep trying,. beallady phool..
Ayubi
On 7/23/08, Salahuddin Ayubi <s_ayubi786@yahoo.com > wrote:Mr. Alamgir,I consider BAL as the enemy fo the people of this country and i am trying to expose them.. Inspite of all their bragging about their contribution to the liberation war I want to prove that they had exploited all to do with the liberation war and take the wind out of their propaganda sail. Once we are able to do that then BAL will be a lame duck.
Salahuddin Ayubi
--- On Tue, 7/22/08, Syed Aslam <Syed.Aslam3@
gmail.com > wrote:How Do you feel?
On 7/21/08, Salahuddin Ayubi <s_ayubi786@yahoo. com> wrote:PS: A quotation : "AMRA KORLE HOI PAP AR BALERA KARLEHOI LEELA KHELA. TAI NA , ALMGIR BHAI?- AYUBIMr. Salahuddin Ayubi -Tit for tat or old-time habit:[Few examples - Tip of the iceberg]Tit for tat or old-time habit:[Few examples - Tip of the iceberg]Belaady Phool (?????)uncouthunculturedimbecilesRip van AhammakKajer MaliRice UddinAss lameLangra ghora[Do you to see more ??????]Still continuing with your oblique attacks:(1) bouts of hallucination.(2) one who suffers from schizoprenia.(3) bull shitting .....This list goes on ... will published by Mass Communication Department [Journalism Dept], DUpretty soon ...Also Read:
13729 Re: Guess, who is showing mastery over filthy language & polluting t Re: Guess, who is showing mastery over filthy language & polluting t
*Guess, who is showing mastery over filthy language & polluting the entire environment !* WRT: http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/notun_ bangladesh/ message/13702 ...&Syed AslamPS:How do you feel??? "Every action has equal and opposite reaction" - You only prove your culture,and prove actually who you are, through your posts ..... Thanks .....On 7/22/08, Salahuddin Ayubi <s_ayubi786@yahoo. com> wrote:
Mr. Aslam,
You had no busdsiness to twist my name. What i did is just tit for tat. Now it hurts you. Dont you think that it hurt me whe I found my name twisted by you to mskr my nsmr sppear like that of the Army chief. Was it not done with malafide intention. When you twisted my nme you should have seen it foming as in law of physics there is something called "Every action has equal and opposite reaction"
If you repeat this I wil be compeled to come up with something more innovative.
Salahuddin Ayubi
On 7/22/08, Salahuddin Ayubi <s_ayubi786@yahoo. com> wrote:Mr. Aslam,
Please stop bull shitting and come to the point and answer the questionws that I placed before you.
Salahuddin ayubi
You should not be complaining as you started the mud slinging by distorting my name, you had no business to do that. now that i have called you by your proper name it hurts you. Take this sportingly as tit for tat. Every action has equal and oppomite reaction is a law of physics. You should have seen it coming when you twisted my nake.
You have not replied to the queries that I have made and summerily come to the conclusion that i have admitted and agreed wwith you.
I am sorry that I give up as I can not win an argument with a peron who has bouts of hallucination.
You either answer to the six points mentioned in my post or just shut up. I am not prepared to go into any arguement with some one who suffers from schizoprenia.
Salahuddin Ayubi
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___